RSS Feed (xml)
Τρίτη 29 Ιουνίου 2010
Δευτέρα 28 Ιουνίου 2010
Σάββατο 19 Ιουνίου 2010
Παρασκευή 18 Ιουνίου 2010
Τετάρτη 16 Ιουνίου 2010
Τρίτη 15 Ιουνίου 2010
Παρασκευή 11 Ιουνίου 2010
Some Considerations in Thai Dating...
Some Considerations in Thai Dating...
When European blokes travel to Thailand to meet a lady, lots of them will register with 1 of the Thai dating firms that are plentiful in Bangkok. Once there, they meet several ladies who parallel their criteria, many of them young and cute and, for a good number of these guys, matrimony will come after the Thai dating experience promptly. This gives them a girlish wife, who is typically very cute and has everything a guy believes he desires.
For the girls who register with the Thai dating firms, they often claim they desire a man who is kindhearted, considerate, will take care of me, has money and a lucrative job. When they meet an older American man, through the Thai dating agency, they assume he possesses all these characteristics.
The problems begin for the lady when they get back to the man’s home country to find he is a working class guy, with little money and no social interactions. I’ve met Thai women who have married a fellow like this, traveled to England to live together, and realized within several weeks that this fellow and way of life is not possible for them. They turned up back on the 1st airplane to Thailand a few weeks later. For Thai women who decide on this life, they want to visit other countries. All Thais however love Thailand and the lifestyle there. It only requires a few weeks in the cold of Europe or the brashness of Australia for them to realize they need no part of it.
For the blokes, they get married to Thai girl believing they have met somebody who is cute, youthful, will adore them and take care of them, and be their fantasy wife. Truth sets in when the true persona of the Thai bride comes forward. Thai women have an external demeanor of calmness and obedience. In reality, Thai women control the home and have strong persona’s. For a Western fellow who assumed he had his subservient fantasy girl, it’s an immense wake up call. All of a sudden their Thai spouse is stricter and more difficult to please than any European lady they’ve ever encountered.
Additionally there is the reality that the American guy is deluding himself when he assumes a young, cute Thai woman is dating or wedding him for himself. These girls are looking for a better existence (who can condemn them!), and it’s completely about lifestyle. Most of them wouldn’t choose the fifty-five year old European bloke if they had other options. But, if the 55 year old American man comes with a large house, a nice car and a full savings account – yep, they’ll marry him. Some time later though, when he finds communication with his wife is confined because her language skills are mediocre and she has different interests and tastes, that’s when these men begin thinking about divorce.
For the girls, Thailand has become a country that is about cash and affluence. Many average Thai girls have no way of achieving this so, when a European guy shows up like a knight in shining armor, not many of them will refuse his propositions. Everything they’ve ever desired is being handed to them. Why would they reject it? And they are even turning to the Thai dating sites in droves to obtain this lifestyle for themselves.
When European blokes travel to Thailand to meet a lady, lots of them will register with 1 of the Thai dating firms that are plentiful in Bangkok. Once there, they meet several ladies who parallel their criteria, many of them young and cute and, for a good number of these guys, matrimony will come after the Thai dating experience promptly. This gives them a girlish wife, who is typically very cute and has everything a guy believes he desires.
For the girls who register with the Thai dating firms, they often claim they desire a man who is kindhearted, considerate, will take care of me, has money and a lucrative job. When they meet an older American man, through the Thai dating agency, they assume he possesses all these characteristics.
The problems begin for the lady when they get back to the man’s home country to find he is a working class guy, with little money and no social interactions. I’ve met Thai women who have married a fellow like this, traveled to England to live together, and realized within several weeks that this fellow and way of life is not possible for them. They turned up back on the 1st airplane to Thailand a few weeks later. For Thai women who decide on this life, they want to visit other countries. All Thais however love Thailand and the lifestyle there. It only requires a few weeks in the cold of Europe or the brashness of Australia for them to realize they need no part of it.
For the blokes, they get married to Thai girl believing they have met somebody who is cute, youthful, will adore them and take care of them, and be their fantasy wife. Truth sets in when the true persona of the Thai bride comes forward. Thai women have an external demeanor of calmness and obedience. In reality, Thai women control the home and have strong persona’s. For a Western fellow who assumed he had his subservient fantasy girl, it’s an immense wake up call. All of a sudden their Thai spouse is stricter and more difficult to please than any European lady they’ve ever encountered.
Additionally there is the reality that the American guy is deluding himself when he assumes a young, cute Thai woman is dating or wedding him for himself. These girls are looking for a better existence (who can condemn them!), and it’s completely about lifestyle. Most of them wouldn’t choose the fifty-five year old European bloke if they had other options. But, if the 55 year old American man comes with a large house, a nice car and a full savings account – yep, they’ll marry him. Some time later though, when he finds communication with his wife is confined because her language skills are mediocre and she has different interests and tastes, that’s when these men begin thinking about divorce.
For the girls, Thailand has become a country that is about cash and affluence. Many average Thai girls have no way of achieving this so, when a European guy shows up like a knight in shining armor, not many of them will refuse his propositions. Everything they’ve ever desired is being handed to them. Why would they reject it? And they are even turning to the Thai dating sites in droves to obtain this lifestyle for themselves.
Thai bride...
You might have noticed a craze in Thailand for quite a few years. A trend of Western blokes coming to Thailand and signing with personals agencies to find a Thai bride. As European culture mutates and Western women become more self reliant and increasingly like guys, traditional European blokes are looking to Thailand to locate a more conventional wife. Thai women are frequently sexy, slim, take very good care of themselves and also take very good care of their spouses. They cook, they keep the house, they take care of the children and they make their man feel as if he is a King. It’s no wonder American guys want a Thai bride.
Thai Married Couple
For the ladies, the blokes are perceived as a good catch. Western guys, even less affluent ones, typically have more money than Thai guys. European fellows present a Thai woman a chance to depart Thailand and experience a different country. European fellows are perceived by some Thai women as being nicer than Thai men and Thai men have a reputation of not being monogamous. Many Thai men also don’t settle down after marriage, and keep a second wife even though they have a spouse and kids at home. So for many Thai ladies, a American bloke afford things a Thai man does not.
As you can imagine, there will be several problems in wedding a Thai bride. Language differences, cultural differences and visa issues come directly to my mind when considering some of the concerns that Thai-Western couples could run into. Overall though a Thai bride can be a great idea for many fellows that have become disappointed with American girls. If you start the partnership with some forethought and with caution you have every chance of having a successful marriage.
To the fellows who come to Thailand looking for love and a Thai bride, I say “Best of luck”. It can occur for you, especially in this day and age of net dating and personals. To the Thai women I say Get to know this fellow slowly. In any country, there are good and bad men. Look out for danger signs, and trust your heart. If you have questions, they are present for a reason. Money isn’t everything.
Thai Married Couple
For the ladies, the blokes are perceived as a good catch. Western guys, even less affluent ones, typically have more money than Thai guys. European fellows present a Thai woman a chance to depart Thailand and experience a different country. European fellows are perceived by some Thai women as being nicer than Thai men and Thai men have a reputation of not being monogamous. Many Thai men also don’t settle down after marriage, and keep a second wife even though they have a spouse and kids at home. So for many Thai ladies, a American bloke afford things a Thai man does not.
As you can imagine, there will be several problems in wedding a Thai bride. Language differences, cultural differences and visa issues come directly to my mind when considering some of the concerns that Thai-Western couples could run into. Overall though a Thai bride can be a great idea for many fellows that have become disappointed with American girls. If you start the partnership with some forethought and with caution you have every chance of having a successful marriage.
To the fellows who come to Thailand looking for love and a Thai bride, I say “Best of luck”. It can occur for you, especially in this day and age of net dating and personals. To the Thai women I say Get to know this fellow slowly. In any country, there are good and bad men. Look out for danger signs, and trust your heart. If you have questions, they are present for a reason. Money isn’t everything.
10 Thailand beaches...
While visiting Thailand do remember that Thailand beaches are some of the most amazing beaches in the world. There are hundreds of soft, sandy beaches here to choose from. Here are the top 10 Thailand beaches, and one bonus tour of Railay Beach located just off Ao Nang in Krabi province.
1. White Sand Beach, Ko Chang
Ko Chang, “Elephant Island,” is the second largest island in Thailand and located just over 180 miles east from Bangkok, near the border of Cambodia. Ko Chang’s best beaches are on the west coast. It’s almost shameful to name one of them as the best, as they are all breathtaking, but White Sand Beach is the most popular of them and quite an idyllic spot. Explore the entire west coast of this island if you can; there are many hidden bays with few people about.
2. Hat Sai Kaeo, Ko Samet
“Diamond Beach” (also known as “Crystal Sand Beach”), is an especially beautiful and popular beach for Thais and expats living in Bangkok during long weekends. Hat Sai Kaeo is about one-third of a mile long and is filled with things to do. In addition to swimming, many tourists enjoy jet skiing, windsurfing and riding banana boats — a long, yellow inflated float that bounces riders off if they don’t hang on tightly enough.
3. Ao Manao, Prachuap Khiri Khan
prachuap-khiri-khanAbout six miles from the border of Myanmar on the western gulf of Thailand is Ao Manao (“Lemon Beach”), once a battlefield for Thai and Japanese forces. Today it’s a quiet haven, almost untouched by western tourists and one of Thailand’s secret jewels. There are many miles of family-friendly and stunning beaches, some of them formed temporarily by sandbars at low tide. Don’t miss dining on some of the freshest seafood in Thailand here.
4. Phranang Bay, Railay Peninsula, Krabi.
ao-phra-nang-beach-northThe Railay peninsula in Krabi is world-renown for its phenomenal rock climbing opportunities for both novice and professional climbers. Getting here is by longtail boat and takes about 20 minutes from tourist hotspot, Ao Nang Beach. From Railay East Beach, a 15-minute walk on a winding sidewalk at the base of a cliff brings you to gorgeous Phranang Bay. You can swim under overhanging limestone karsts, or climb and jump off small cliffs into the deep emerald green water of the Andaman Sea. This beach is perfect for families, swimming, kayaking, snorkeling, and exploring.
5. Ao Nang Beach, Krabi.
ao-nang-beachAo Nang is one of the most popular beaches in Thailand, as it is well developed and offers street shopping, top western and Thai restaurants, and is scenic and affordable. There is one particular stretch of beach on the southern most point that is just heavenly. To get there walk south on the sidewalk along Ao Nang beach. Walk past the large area of outdoor massage tables to just before the troop of monkeys. There is excellent swimming and scenery here at the base of a few hundred-foot limestone karsts.
6. Tonsai Bay, Ko Phi Phi
“Ko” or “koh” means “island” in Thai. World-famous Ko Phi Phi is comprised of two islands; “Don” the larger, and “Leh” the smaller island located off the southern tip of Krabi town. A two-hour ferry boat will take you from Ao Nang beach in Krabi for just under $20. Tonsai bay (Ao Tonsai) is on the south side of Ko Phi Phi Don. It’s scenic beyond words. Don’t miss this one if you get a chance!
7. Noppharat Thara, Krabi.
noppharat-thara-vertNoppharat Thara was a free public beach up until 2008. Now tourists are charged 400 Thai baht for entrance into this spectacular national park. An ideal family beach, one can sit in the shade of the fir trees eating a picnic like the locals or walk during low tide in shallow water out to one of the three islands just over 100 yards offshore. Noppharat Thara is just over one mile in length and located just west of Ao Nang in Krabi.
8. Tong Takien Bay, Ko Samui Island.
tong-takien-bayLocated on the southeast side of Ko Samui, almost hidden between Chaweng and Lamae, is a secluded and calm bay with excellent swimming, snorkeling and kayaking called “Tong Takien,” which means a type of fish’s belly in Thai. Some maps call it “Silver Beach.” This beach is family-friendly, clean, and has some bungalow-style accommodations for as low as 500 Thai baht during the low season.
9. Sairee Beach, Ko Tao
Ko Tao is the island tourists choose to get away from the crowds on nearby Ko Phangan and Ko Samui. By ferry (no airport) it’s two or three hours from Chumphon, and four to nine hours from Surat Thani on the night boat. Ko Tao is affordable, quiet, remote, and ideal for reading and relaxing all day in a hammock on the porch of your jungle bungalow. Sairee Beach is the most popular spot on Ko Tao and offers massage, drinks, and all types of food and services.
10. Surin Beach, Phuket
Finally, there’s Surin Beach just north of Patong and Kamala beaches on the island of Phuket. Surin is the ideal beach destination for visitors that like to be pampered. You need not do anything; lay back and relax as an almost endless parade of Thai touts with everything from fried chicken, shrimp, and squid to watches, sarongs, and phallus carvings trudge by every few minutes. Excellent Thai beach massages can be had, as well as alcohol of every sort. Swimming is excellent at Surin and they have a freshwater hose to wash off the salt water and sand when you’re ready to go back home.
1. White Sand Beach, Ko Chang
Ko Chang, “Elephant Island,” is the second largest island in Thailand and located just over 180 miles east from Bangkok, near the border of Cambodia. Ko Chang’s best beaches are on the west coast. It’s almost shameful to name one of them as the best, as they are all breathtaking, but White Sand Beach is the most popular of them and quite an idyllic spot. Explore the entire west coast of this island if you can; there are many hidden bays with few people about.
2. Hat Sai Kaeo, Ko Samet
“Diamond Beach” (also known as “Crystal Sand Beach”), is an especially beautiful and popular beach for Thais and expats living in Bangkok during long weekends. Hat Sai Kaeo is about one-third of a mile long and is filled with things to do. In addition to swimming, many tourists enjoy jet skiing, windsurfing and riding banana boats — a long, yellow inflated float that bounces riders off if they don’t hang on tightly enough.
3. Ao Manao, Prachuap Khiri Khan
prachuap-khiri-khanAbout six miles from the border of Myanmar on the western gulf of Thailand is Ao Manao (“Lemon Beach”), once a battlefield for Thai and Japanese forces. Today it’s a quiet haven, almost untouched by western tourists and one of Thailand’s secret jewels. There are many miles of family-friendly and stunning beaches, some of them formed temporarily by sandbars at low tide. Don’t miss dining on some of the freshest seafood in Thailand here.
4. Phranang Bay, Railay Peninsula, Krabi.
ao-phra-nang-beach-northThe Railay peninsula in Krabi is world-renown for its phenomenal rock climbing opportunities for both novice and professional climbers. Getting here is by longtail boat and takes about 20 minutes from tourist hotspot, Ao Nang Beach. From Railay East Beach, a 15-minute walk on a winding sidewalk at the base of a cliff brings you to gorgeous Phranang Bay. You can swim under overhanging limestone karsts, or climb and jump off small cliffs into the deep emerald green water of the Andaman Sea. This beach is perfect for families, swimming, kayaking, snorkeling, and exploring.
5. Ao Nang Beach, Krabi.
ao-nang-beachAo Nang is one of the most popular beaches in Thailand, as it is well developed and offers street shopping, top western and Thai restaurants, and is scenic and affordable. There is one particular stretch of beach on the southern most point that is just heavenly. To get there walk south on the sidewalk along Ao Nang beach. Walk past the large area of outdoor massage tables to just before the troop of monkeys. There is excellent swimming and scenery here at the base of a few hundred-foot limestone karsts.
6. Tonsai Bay, Ko Phi Phi
“Ko” or “koh” means “island” in Thai. World-famous Ko Phi Phi is comprised of two islands; “Don” the larger, and “Leh” the smaller island located off the southern tip of Krabi town. A two-hour ferry boat will take you from Ao Nang beach in Krabi for just under $20. Tonsai bay (Ao Tonsai) is on the south side of Ko Phi Phi Don. It’s scenic beyond words. Don’t miss this one if you get a chance!
7. Noppharat Thara, Krabi.
noppharat-thara-vertNoppharat Thara was a free public beach up until 2008. Now tourists are charged 400 Thai baht for entrance into this spectacular national park. An ideal family beach, one can sit in the shade of the fir trees eating a picnic like the locals or walk during low tide in shallow water out to one of the three islands just over 100 yards offshore. Noppharat Thara is just over one mile in length and located just west of Ao Nang in Krabi.
8. Tong Takien Bay, Ko Samui Island.
tong-takien-bayLocated on the southeast side of Ko Samui, almost hidden between Chaweng and Lamae, is a secluded and calm bay with excellent swimming, snorkeling and kayaking called “Tong Takien,” which means a type of fish’s belly in Thai. Some maps call it “Silver Beach.” This beach is family-friendly, clean, and has some bungalow-style accommodations for as low as 500 Thai baht during the low season.
9. Sairee Beach, Ko Tao
Ko Tao is the island tourists choose to get away from the crowds on nearby Ko Phangan and Ko Samui. By ferry (no airport) it’s two or three hours from Chumphon, and four to nine hours from Surat Thani on the night boat. Ko Tao is affordable, quiet, remote, and ideal for reading and relaxing all day in a hammock on the porch of your jungle bungalow. Sairee Beach is the most popular spot on Ko Tao and offers massage, drinks, and all types of food and services.
10. Surin Beach, Phuket
Finally, there’s Surin Beach just north of Patong and Kamala beaches on the island of Phuket. Surin is the ideal beach destination for visitors that like to be pampered. You need not do anything; lay back and relax as an almost endless parade of Thai touts with everything from fried chicken, shrimp, and squid to watches, sarongs, and phallus carvings trudge by every few minutes. Excellent Thai beach massages can be had, as well as alcohol of every sort. Swimming is excellent at Surin and they have a freshwater hose to wash off the salt water and sand when you’re ready to go back home.
Tiger Temple Thailand...
Tiger Temple Thailand
Filed under Buddhist temples
Tiger temple Thailand (Bangkok) is perhaps the most famous Buddhist Wat to visit and it is located in Bangkok. Tiger Temple has many live tigers there you can have your photos taken with. The tigers have been raised there since babies and I don’t think they’ve brought any wild tigers there that they interact with and let the tourists get close with.
Wat Pha Luang is a Theravada Buddhist temple located near Bangkok, but in the Sai Yok area of Kanchanaburi close to Myanmar. It began in the year of Buddha 2537 (1994).
In 2542 (1999) the temple was given it’s first tiger cub and the tigers have grown in number to about 50 tigers both cubs and adults.
The tigers are well cared for and given vitamin supplements to go along with their regular diet of cooked (boiled) chicken, beef, and dried feline food.
The tigers at Wat Pha Luang are cared for by a combination of monks, and volunteers. Tourists can have their photos taken with the tigers – and even interact with them. Apparently it costs about $100 USD per tiger to feed and take care of them. The entrance fee at the Tiger Temple covers these necessary costs. Entrance fee in 2010? 500 THB – about $16 USD per person.
If you really want to have a once-in-a-lifetime experience you can come for the morning exercise program that costs 4,500 THB. You’ll interact with the volunteers and the tigers on a more extensive level.
Tiger Temple in Kanchanaburi is not to be confused with another Theravada Buddhist temple in Southern Thailand called, Wat Tum Sua (Wat Tham Seua) – which means Tiger Cave Temple. Tiger Cave temple is founded on a spot where a tiger lived in a cave there years ago. Ajarn Jumnien is the abbot. There are 1,237 steps to climb up a mountain to an incredible Buddhist shrine including a large gold Buddha and great view of the Krabi province.
Filed under Buddhist temples
Tiger temple Thailand (Bangkok) is perhaps the most famous Buddhist Wat to visit and it is located in Bangkok. Tiger Temple has many live tigers there you can have your photos taken with. The tigers have been raised there since babies and I don’t think they’ve brought any wild tigers there that they interact with and let the tourists get close with.
Wat Pha Luang is a Theravada Buddhist temple located near Bangkok, but in the Sai Yok area of Kanchanaburi close to Myanmar. It began in the year of Buddha 2537 (1994).
In 2542 (1999) the temple was given it’s first tiger cub and the tigers have grown in number to about 50 tigers both cubs and adults.
The tigers are well cared for and given vitamin supplements to go along with their regular diet of cooked (boiled) chicken, beef, and dried feline food.
The tigers at Wat Pha Luang are cared for by a combination of monks, and volunteers. Tourists can have their photos taken with the tigers – and even interact with them. Apparently it costs about $100 USD per tiger to feed and take care of them. The entrance fee at the Tiger Temple covers these necessary costs. Entrance fee in 2010? 500 THB – about $16 USD per person.
If you really want to have a once-in-a-lifetime experience you can come for the morning exercise program that costs 4,500 THB. You’ll interact with the volunteers and the tigers on a more extensive level.
Tiger Temple in Kanchanaburi is not to be confused with another Theravada Buddhist temple in Southern Thailand called, Wat Tum Sua (Wat Tham Seua) – which means Tiger Cave Temple. Tiger Cave temple is founded on a spot where a tiger lived in a cave there years ago. Ajarn Jumnien is the abbot. There are 1,237 steps to climb up a mountain to an incredible Buddhist shrine including a large gold Buddha and great view of the Krabi province.
Τετάρτη 9 Ιουνίου 2010
Τρίτη 8 Ιουνίου 2010
An American national
An American national and former US fighter pilot with the Marine Corp. has fallen to his death from his 25th floor apartment in North Pattaya. The deceased’s body was severed in two after hitting the balcony of another condo during the fall. Investigations into the matter are continuing, however; depression over his congenital heart condition is believe to have led the man to commit suicide.
Pattaya, the 23rd of April 2010 [PDN]: At approximately 1:00pm on Friday, police Lieutenant Colonel Rerngwit Rakchat (Pattaya Police Investigator) was notified that a foreign man had fallen from his 25th floor room at the Mark Land Hotel & Spa, Pattaya Beach Road, North Pattaya. A team of investigative officers were dispatched to the scene along with the Sawang Boriboon Foundation.
At the scene, police discovered the scattered remains of American national, Mr. Paul Royal Osbourne [73] a former fighter pilot in the US Marine Corp. Mr. Osbourne had allegedly jumped from his 25th floor apartment, impacting with a 7th floor balcony before his severed body came to rest on the 5th floor Swimming pool area.
Interrogation with Mr. Osbourne’s Thai wife of 8 years, Mrs. Phukonk Butsabong [29] revealed that he had been suffering with several serious illnesses over the past 2 years. Conditions including; high blood pressure, diabetes and an unknown congenital heart disease causing him to become severely depressed. Mr. Osbourne had been unable to walk unassisted and had been on a respiration unit 24 hours-a-day for quite some time. No evidence of a struggle was found in the apartment, however; a footprint, believed to be that of Mr. Osbourne, was later found on the balcony railing of the condo.
On the morning of Mr. Osbourne’s death, Mrs. Butsabong explains that she had left her husband sitting out on the condo’s balcony whilst going to visit a neighbour. Upon hearing a loud thud she returned to the room to find her husband missing. After searching the apartment she discovered that he had fallen from the balcony and was lying dead on the ground below their condo. Mrs. Butsabong explained that, the day before his death, Mr. Osbourne had been in a more depressive state than usual, stating that she did not think he was contemplating suicide despite his introverted nature.
At present police assume that Mr. Osbourne had committed suicide over depression regarding his failing health and the fact that he had allegedly attempted suicide on several other occasion. A full investigation into the incident will be carried out before police inform the US embassy in Bangkok.
Copyright © 2009 www.pattayadailynews.com All Rights Reserved
Pattaya, the 23rd of April 2010 [PDN]: At approximately 1:00pm on Friday, police Lieutenant Colonel Rerngwit Rakchat (Pattaya Police Investigator) was notified that a foreign man had fallen from his 25th floor room at the Mark Land Hotel & Spa, Pattaya Beach Road, North Pattaya. A team of investigative officers were dispatched to the scene along with the Sawang Boriboon Foundation.
At the scene, police discovered the scattered remains of American national, Mr. Paul Royal Osbourne [73] a former fighter pilot in the US Marine Corp. Mr. Osbourne had allegedly jumped from his 25th floor apartment, impacting with a 7th floor balcony before his severed body came to rest on the 5th floor Swimming pool area.
Interrogation with Mr. Osbourne’s Thai wife of 8 years, Mrs. Phukonk Butsabong [29] revealed that he had been suffering with several serious illnesses over the past 2 years. Conditions including; high blood pressure, diabetes and an unknown congenital heart disease causing him to become severely depressed. Mr. Osbourne had been unable to walk unassisted and had been on a respiration unit 24 hours-a-day for quite some time. No evidence of a struggle was found in the apartment, however; a footprint, believed to be that of Mr. Osbourne, was later found on the balcony railing of the condo.
On the morning of Mr. Osbourne’s death, Mrs. Butsabong explains that she had left her husband sitting out on the condo’s balcony whilst going to visit a neighbour. Upon hearing a loud thud she returned to the room to find her husband missing. After searching the apartment she discovered that he had fallen from the balcony and was lying dead on the ground below their condo. Mrs. Butsabong explained that, the day before his death, Mr. Osbourne had been in a more depressive state than usual, stating that she did not think he was contemplating suicide despite his introverted nature.
At present police assume that Mr. Osbourne had committed suicide over depression regarding his failing health and the fact that he had allegedly attempted suicide on several other occasion. A full investigation into the incident will be carried out before police inform the US embassy in Bangkok.
Copyright © 2009 www.pattayadailynews.com All Rights Reserved
Human Rights Practices....
Human Rights Practices
March 11, 2010
Thailand is a constitutional monarchy with a population of more than 66 million. The king is revered and exerts strong informal influence. In the most recent election for the lower house of the parliament, held in December 2007, the People's Power Party, led by Samak Sundaravej, won a plurality. After Constitutional Court rulings that forced two prime ministers to step down in 2008, a government led by Abhisit Vejjajiva was inaugurated in December 2008. In March 2008 voters elected 76 senators for the upper house of the parliament. The election process for both legislative bodies was generally viewed as free and fair, but there were widespread allegations of vote buying. The continuing internal conflict in the southernmost provinces led the government to restrict some rights and delegate certain internal security powers to the armed forces. Civilian authorities generally maintained effective control of the security forces.
The government's respect for human rights remained unchanged from the previous year. Security forces continued at times to use excessive force against criminal suspects, and there were reports that police tortured, beat, and otherwise abused suspects, detainees, and prisoners, many of whom were held in overcrowded and unsanitary conditions. There were numerous dismissals, arrests, prosecutions, and convictions of security forces in response to this behavior; however, official impunity continued to be a serious problem. Police corruption was widespread. A separatist insurgency in the southern part of the country resulted in numerous human rights abuses, including killings, committed by ethnic Malay Muslim insurgents, Buddhist defense volunteers, and government security forces. The government maintained some limits on freedom of speech, of the press, and of assembly. Human rights workers, particularly those focusing on violence in the south, reported harassment and intimidation. Trafficking in persons remained a problem. Members of hill tribes without proper documentation continued to face restrictions on their movement, could not own land, and were not protected by labor laws. Government enforcement of labor laws was ineffective.
Political unrest occurred in March and April in Pattaya and Bangkok, when opposition street protests led to the cancellation of an Asian summit in Pattaya and riots in Bangkok, with two civilians killed by antigovernment protesters. The government declared a state of emergency in the Pattaya area on April 11 and in Bangkok on April 12, and the military restored order in Bangkok on April 13-14.
RESPECT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS
Section 1 Respect for the Integrity of the Person, Including Freedom From:
a. Arbitrary or Unlawful Deprivation of Life
There were no confirmed reports that the government or its agents committed any politically motivated killings; however, security forces occasionally used excessive and at times lethal force against criminal suspects and committed or were connected to extrajudicial, arbitrary, and unlawful killings, including killings by security force personnel acting in a private capacity. Government law enforcement bodies and courts took action in some cases, including suspected extrajudicial killings by police in Kalasin Province.
According to the Ministry of Interior's (MOI) Investigation and Legal Affairs Bureau, between January and November, 733 persons died in prison and 24 while in police custody. Authorities attributed most of the deaths to natural causes. Police killed 50 suspects during the arrest process.
By year's end no member of Task Force 39 had been charged in connection with the death of Imam Yapa Koseng while in army custody in March 2008. There were three lawsuits pending in the case: the potential criminal proceeding against the military suspects, under consideration by the National Counter-Corruption Commission (NCCC) since June 2008; the civil lawsuit filed by Yapa's family in March against the Ministry of Defense, Royal Thai Army (RTA), and Royal Thai Police (RTP) that was put on hold pending the resolution of a jurisdictional problem; and a criminal lawsuit filed on August 20 by the family against the alleged perpetrators.
There were no developments in the 2007 death of Nopphon Chaiwichit in Nakhon Si Thammarat Province. At year's end the Crime Suppression Police Division in Bangkok continued its investigation.
At year's end the case of the 2007 shooting by Preecha Panpayap, a MOI security official, in Mae Hong Son Province that killed Karenni refugee Aie Oo had not reached the prosecution or trial stage. On January 27, authorities forwarded the matter to the provincial police, which established an investigatory committee but made no determination. The governor of Mae Hong Son brought the case to the Office of the Attorney General (OAG) in June 2008. In November the OAG decided that it would not prosecute Preecha for deliberate homicide.The Department of Special Investigation's (DSI) Special Case Center accepted for investigation 10 cases suspected of being related to the 2003 "War on Drugs" campaign for investigation, although the killings occurred after 2003. The DSI forwarded eight of the cases to the OAG and one to the NCCC, and it continued to investigate one case. The DSI issued warrants for six police officers in Kalasin Province in relation to the killing of Kiattisak Thitboonkhrong and the subsequent cover-up. In August the DSI submitted a brief to the state prosecutor; on September 9, the prosecutor filed criminal charges, including a charge of abuse of power for the three commissioned officers involved.
In October several police officers and civilians exhausted their appeals in relation to the kidnapping and murder of the wife and son of jeweler Santi Sithanakhan during the investigation of the Saudi Arabian palace jewel theft in 1994. The Supreme Court upheld the death sentence of former police commissioner Chalo Koetthet for masterminding the scheme. Similarly, it upheld the life sentences received by one police officer and two civilians. As for the remaining defendants, another officer and a civilian died in prison, the last two civilians received minor sentences, and a final officer was acquitted.
According to the Thailand Mine Action Center, during the year there were 10 injuries due to landmines, occurring in Buriram, Kanchanaburi, Sakaew, Sisaket, and Trat provinces. The government continued significant public awareness campaigns, including sending landmine awareness teams to the affected villages and landmine education teams to local schools to inform students about the risk and prevention of landmine injury.
There were at least four violent incidents between Thai border rangers and Cambodian illegal loggers during the year. For example, on September 11, border rangers shot at a group of Cambodians illegally logging on the Thai side of the border in Surin Province. One Cambodian was killed and another wounded in the incident. On November 27, border rangers allegedly shot and killed one individual among a group of seven Cambodian illegal loggers in Kap Cheung District, also in Surin Province.
b. Disappearance
There were no reports of politically motivated disappearances. There were no confirmed reports that individuals disappeared after being questioned by security officials in the southern provinces.
On December 11 in Narathiwat Province, relatives reported that Abduloh Abukaree disappeared after failing to return home from a nearby tea shop. He was a key witness in a DSI case against high-ranking police officials, connected to the disappearance of Somchai Neelaphaijit (see below).
There were no developments in the February 2008 case of Kamol Laosophaphant, a businessman in Khon Kaen Province who disappeared after going to a police station to lodge criminal complaints against local officials concerning state railway land deals. However, the DSI accepted it as a special case and was investigating it.
Utsaman Awaenu, a navy draftee stationed in Sattahip, Chonburi Province, who disappeared in February 2008, was located in mid-2008 by his family with the assistance of the Muslim Attorney Center and the Cross Cultural Foundation.
There were no developments in the 2007 abduction of Anukorn Waithanomsak, an assistant to a leader of the United Front for Democracy Against Dictatorship (UDD).
On March 19, a civil court declared Muslim attorney and human rights activist Somchai Neelaphaijit legally missing, five years after his disappearance. In January his wife, Angkhana Neelaphaijit, met with Prime Minister (PM) Abhisit, who susbsequently pressured the DSI to pursue any remaining leads in the case. The DSI conducted several searches and declared there was no new evidence. In March the DSI stated that Police Major Ngern Thongsuk, convicted in 2007 of coercion for his role in forcing Somchai into a car, was living in a neighboring country and had not died in a September 2008 mudslide in Kanchanaburi Province as previously claimed. On March 11, Deputy PM Suthep Thaugsuban stated that those involved in Somchai's abduction would be prosecuted; however, at year's end no additional individuals had been charged. Somchai's disappearance in 2004 was thought to be connected to his legal representation of criminal suspects who allegedly had been tortured by high-ranking police officials. At year's end that case was before the NCCC, and one of the key witnesses, Abduloh Abukaree, disappeared on December 11, before he was able to testify.
c. Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
The constitution specifically prohibits such practices, but there is no law that specifically prohibits torture, and it is not punishable as an offense under criminal law. Nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and legal entities continued to report that members of the police and military occasionally tortured and beat suspects to obtain confessions. There were newspaper reports of numerous cases in which citizens accused police and other security officials of using brutality. At year's end no military personnel had been charged or prosecuted; however, there were criminal actions against RTP officers.
RTP Captain Nat Chonnithiwat and seven other police officers in the 41st Border Patrol Police unit were convicted by two separate Bangkok courts on charges of assault, illegal detention, extortion, and receiving bribes. Many of the victims were beaten, subjected to electric shock, and had plastic bags placed over their heads to force them to confess. Others were forced to pay bribes of cash and jewelry to have charges reduced against them. At least 61 individuals filed complaints against these officers; in July they were sentenced to three years in prison, and in December they were sentenced to an additional five years.
The RTP continued its investigation of the January 2008 alleged torture of university students Ismael Tae and Amisi Manak by Yala's Task Force ll and soldiers from a camp in Pattani. The relatives of the victims also filed a civil suit against the RTA, which was pending at year's end.
Prison and Detention Center Conditions
Prison conditions were poor. Prisons and detention centers were overcrowded. There were approximately 200,000 prisoners in prisons and detention facilities designed to hold 100,000. Sleeping accommodations were insufficient, medical care was inadequate, and communicable diseases were widespread in some prisons. Seriously ill prisoners at times were transferred to provincial or state hospitals.
Prison authorities sometimes used solitary confinement of not more than one month, as permitted by law, to punish male prisoners who consistently violated prison rules or regulations, although the Department of Corrections maintained that the average confinement was approximately seven days. Authorities also used heavy leg irons to control prisoners who were deemed escape risks or harmful to other prisoners.
Approximately 14 percent of the prison population consisted of pretrial detainees, who were not segregated from the general prison population. Men, women, and children often were held together in police station cells pending indictment. Separate facilities for juvenile offenders were available in all provinces. In rare instances juveniles were detained with adults.
Conditions in immigration detention centers (IDCs) remained poor. The Immigration Police Bureau, reporting to the Office of the Prime Minister, administered IDCs, which were not subject to many of the regulations that governed the regular prison system. There were reports that guards physically abused detainees in some IDCs. Overcrowding and a lack of basic medical care continued to be serious problems. There were also complaints of inadequate and culturally inappropriate food, especially by Muslim detainees.
International observers reported continued overcrowded conditions for detainees in Bangkok's Suan Phlu IDC. Observers alleged that detainees were abused while in detention. There were reports that detainees, including children, were not permitted to exercise at some facilities.
Access to prisons was not restricted, and the government permitted visits by independent human rights observers and the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). ICRC representatives were allowed to meet prisoners without third parties present and made repeated visits. However, at year's end the military had not approved ICRC requests to visit military detention facilities in the four southernmost provinces, where detainees allegedly were mistreated. Authorities also continued to deny the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) access to detainees at the Suvarnabhumi Airport IDC in Bangkok. UNHCR officials were able to interview detainees in Suan Phlu IDC, and access for third countries to process recognized refugees for resettlement continued.d. Arbitrary Arrest or Detention
The constitution specifically prohibits arbitrary arrest and detention; however, government forces occasionally arrested and detained persons arbitrarily. Martial law, which gives the military authority to detain persons without charge for a maximum of seven days, remained in force in 31 of the country's 76 provinces.
The Lawyers' Council of Thailand (LCT) received 115 complaints during the year from residents of the southern provinces about security force operations, including improper searches and arrests made by citing the emergency decree and presenting warrants afterwards.
Role of the Police and Security Apparatus
The RTP has the authority to minimize threats to internal security and suppress criminal activity. It is under the direct supervision of the prime minister and a 20-member police commission. The police commissioner general is appointed by the prime minister and subject to cabinet and royal approval. The Border Patrol Police has special authority and responsibility in border areas to combat insurgent or separatist movements.
The February 2008 implementation of the Internal Security Act (ISA) created the Internal Security Operations Command (ISOC) as a state agency under the command of the prime minster, who acts as the ISOC director. The act includes broad powers for the military. Military and civilian personnel make up the ISOC staff; ISOC is intended to function as a national security force to suppress unrest. The ISA was invoked in July for the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Regional Forum in Phuket and repeatedly in the fall for UDD rallies. Human rights organizations and academics criticized the government for repeatedly utilizing the ISA, with approval of the cabinet, to respond to alleged threats to national security by restricting fundamental rights. However, invocation of the ISA did not prevent peaceful assembly of protesters.
Corruption remained widespread among members of the police force. There were numerous incidents of police charged with sexual harassment, theft, and malfeasance. There were reports that police tortured, beat, and otherwise abused detainees and prisoners, generally with impunity. Police officers were arrested for drug trafficking, reportedly involved with intellectual property rights violations, and convicted on extortion charges.
In certain regions and situations where the military plays a security role, soldiers were arrested and charged with drug trafficking and arms trafficking. In July the RTA dismissed 38 noncommissioned officers for fraud and extortion for demanding money for rank and duty promotions.
There were press reports that former police chief Patcharawat Wongsuwan interfered in the investigation of the April attempted killing of People's Alliance for Democracy leader Sondhi Limthongkul. In July arrest warrants were issued for two soldiers and a police officer. In October the NCCC charged Patcharawat with malfeasance for his handling of the violent crackdown on the October 2008 political protesters, leading PM Abhisit to transfer him. The case was forwarded to the OAG but then moved to a joint NCCC-OAG committee in November; at year's end it had not been resolved.
Complaints of police abuse can be filed directly with the superior of the accused police officer, the Office of the Inspector General, or the police commissioner general. The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), LCT, NCCC, Court of Justice, Ministry of Justice (MOJ), and Office of the Prime Minister also accept complaints of police abuse and corruption, as does the Office of the Ombudsman. At year's end there were 22 petitions pending with the LCT seeking assistance to pursue abuse of power cases against the police.
When the police department receives a complaint, an internal investigation committee first takes up the matter and may temporarily suspend the officer during the investigation. Various administrative penalties exist, and serious cases can be referred to a criminal court. The NHRC received approximately 95 complaints of police abuse between October 2008 and the end of the year.
Procedures for investigating suspicious deaths, including deaths occurring in police custody, require that a prosecutor, forensic pathologist, and local administrator participate in the investigation and that in most cases family members have legal representation at the inquests. However, these procedures often were not followed. Families rarely took advantage of a provision in the law that allows them to bring personal lawsuits against police officers for criminal action during arrests.
Arrest Procedures and Treatment While in Detention
With few exceptions, the law requires police to obtain a warrant from a judge prior to making an arrest. In practice the system for issuing arrest warrants was subject to misuse by police officers and a tendency by the courts automatically to approve all requests for warrants. By law persons must be informed of likely charges against them immediately after arrest and must be allowed to inform someone of their arrest. The law provides for access to counsel for criminal detainees; however, lawyers and human rights groups claimed that police often conducted interrogations without providing access to an attorney. Lawyers working in the southern provinces reported that under the emergency decree they were denied adequate access to detained clients, and some individuals in the southern provinces reported they were denied permission to visit detained family members. Foreign detainees sometimes were pressured to sign confessions without the benefit of a competent translator. The MOJ and OAG sought to provide an attorney to indigent detainees at public expense.
Under normal conditions the law allows police to detain criminal suspects for 48 hours after arrest for investigation. Court permission is required to extend detentions for additional periods (up to a maximum of 84 days for the most serious offenses) to conduct investigations. Lawyers reported that police rarely brought cases to court within the 48-hour period. Laws and regulations place offenses for which the maximum penalty is less than three years under the jurisdiction of the district courts, which have different procedures. In these cases police are required to submit cases to public prosecutors within 72 hours of arrest. According to the LCT, pretrial detention of criminal suspects for up to 60 days was common.
The law provides defendants the right to bail, and the government generally respected this right. However, some human rights groups reported that police frequently either did not inform detained suspects of their right to bail or refused to recommend bail after a request was submitted. There were several instances of denial of bail in lese majeste cases; both Boonyuen Prasertying and Suwicha Thakhor were denied bail for three months between their arrests and guilty pleas. In July 2008 police arrested activist Daranee Charnchoengsilpakul (also known as Da Torpedo) on lese majeste charges following speeches at UDD rallies. The court refused her bail on several occasions, and she remained in detention for more than a year before she was sentenced on August 28.
Under martial law the military has the authority to detain persons without charge for a maximum of seven days.
Amnesty
Early in the year, authorities completed the release of 31,149 prisoners pardoned by the king as part of a royal amnesty marking his 80th birthday in 2007.
e. Denial of Fair Public Trial
The constitution provides for an independent judiciary. Although the judiciary generally was regarded as independent, it was subject to corruption and outside influences. According to human rights groups, the lack of progress in several high-profile cases involving alleged abuse by the police and military diminished the public's trust in the justice system and discouraged some victims of human rights abuses (or their families) from seeking justice.
The civilian judicial system has three levels of courts: courts of first instance, courts of appeal, and the Supreme Court of Justice. In addition there is a Constitutional Court, charged with interpreting the constitution, and the Administrative Court, which adjudicates cases involving government officials or state agencies. Justices nominated to the Supreme Administrative Court are confirmed by the Senate after being recruited by a judicial commission consisting of 10 judges and three officials appointed by the Senate and the cabinet. Other judges are career civil servants whose appointments are not subject to parliamentary review.
A separate military court hears criminal and civil cases pertaining to military personnel as well as those brought during periods of martial law. Islamic (Shari'a) courts hear only civil cases concerning family and inheritance matters between Muslim parties in Yala, Pattani, Narathiwat, and Satun provinces.
Trial Procedures
There is no trial by jury. A single judge decides trials for misdemeanors; two or more judges are required for more serious cases. The constitution provides for a prompt trial, although a large backlog of cases remained in the court system. While most trials are public, the court may order a closed trial, particularly in cases involving national security, the royal family, children, or sexual abuse. NGOs criticized the closure of the trial of political activist Daranee Charnchoengsilpakul in June, which resulted in an 18-year sentence. Her attorneys appealed the constitutionality of the trial closure; in December the Constitutional Court declined to accept the petition, reasoning that her conviction could be overturned by either the appeals court or the Supreme Court.
The law provides for the presumption of innocence. In ordinary criminal courts, defendants enjoy a broad range of legal rights, including access to a lawyer of their choosing. A government program sought to provide free legal advice to the poor, but indigent defendants were not automatically provided with counsel at public expense. The MOJ and the OAG remained committed to providing legal aid in both civil and criminal cases but did not allocate sufficient resources. The LCT budget was reduced by more than 25 percent in the year. The legal aid provided was often done on a pro bono, ad hoc basis, and it was of a low standard. Some NGOs reported that legal aid lawyers pressured their clients into paying additional fees directly to them. The court is required to appoint an attorney in cases where the defendant disputes the charges, is indigent, or is a minor, as well as in cases where the possible punishment is more than five years' imprisonment or death. Most free legal aid came from private groups, including the LCT and the Thai Women Lawyers Association. There is no discovery process; consequently, lawyers and defendants do not have access to evidence prior to the trial. The law provides for access to courts or administrative bodies to seek redress, and the government generally respected this right.
Several NGOs expressed concern over the lack of adequate protection for witnesses, particularly in cases involving alleged police wrongdoing. The MOJ's Office of Witness Protection had limited resources and primarily played a coordinating role. In most cases witness protection was provided by the police, but six other state agencies participated in the program. Witnesses, lawyers, and activists involved in cases of alleged police abuse reported that protection was inadequate and that they were intimidated by the police sent to provide protection.
There were no reports of political prisoners or detainees.
Civil Judicial Procedures and Remedies
There is an independent and impartial judiciary in civil matters. The law provides for access to courts and administrative bodies to bring lawsuits seeking damages for, or cessation of, a human rights violation, and the government generally respected this right. However, sections 16 and 17 of the emergency decree, which was in force in the three southern border provinces, expressly exclude scrutiny by the Administrative Court or civil or criminal proceedings against government officials, although victims may seek compensation from a government agency instead.
f. Arbitrary Interference with Privacy, Family, Home, or Correspondence
The constitution specifically prohibits such actions, and the government generally respected these prohibitions in practice. However, martial law gives military forces the authority to conduct searches without a warrant, and this authority was used on some occasions. In addition, the emergency decree covering the southern provinces also allows authorities to make searches and arrests without warrants. The LCT received multiple complaints from persons in the south claiming that security forces abused this authority, but the decree provides security forces broad immunity from prosecution.
Security services monitored persons, including foreign visitors, who espoused extremist or highly controversial views.
In contrast with 2008, there were no reports that police conducted warrantless searches in the northern provinces or that members of indigenous hill tribes were subjected to forced evictions and relocations.
g. Use of Excessive Force and Other Abuses in Internal Conflict
The internal conflict in the ethnic Malay, Muslim-majority, southernmost provinces (Narathiwat, Pattani, Yala, and portions of Songkhla) continued throughout the year. Insurgents carried out almost daily bombings and attacks that caused deaths and injuries. The emergency decree in effect in this area gives military, police, and civilian authorities significant powers to restrict certain basic rights and delegated certain internal security powers to the armed forces. The decree also provides security forces broad immunity from prosecution. The 2006 martial law, which also remained in effect in the provinces of Narathiwat, Pattani, and Yala, gives a wide range of power to security forces.
Killings
Human rights groups accused government forces of extrajudicial killings, arbitrary arrests, and torture of individuals suspected of involvement with separatists. As a result of a series of attacks by suspected insurgents, tension between the local ethnic Malay Muslim and ethnic Thai Buddhist communities continued to grow, alongside a distrust of security officials.
On March 12, suspected insurgents shot prominent human rights activist Laila Paaitae Daoh in Krongpenang, Yala. Laila, who died from her injuries the next day, was the fourth family member to be killed for advocating a peaceful solution to the southern problem. Laila's husband and second son were killed in 2006, and her eldest son was shot and killed in 2004.
On June 8, gunmen opened fire inside the Al Furqon mosque in Narathiwat, killing 10 and injuring 12. Police issued an arrest warrant for a former paramilitary member, Sutthirak Kongsuwan, who was related to a Buddhist villager killed the day before in the neighboring district. Police later issued a second warrant for the alleged getaway driver. Insurgents killed a pregnant Buddhist schoolteacher in the same district earlier that week.
On June 12, gunmen shot two Buddhist monks in Yala while they collected morning alms, killing one and seriously wounding the other.
In February the OAG decided not to pursue criminal charges against any officials involved in the 2004 Krue Se massacre, ending the inquest started in 2007.
On May 29, the Songkhla Provincial Court announced its verdict on the inquest into the deaths of 78 ethnic Malay Muslim detainees at Tak Bai in 2004. The court determined that officers were performing their duty and were not responsible based on the immunity granted them through provisions in the emergency decree.
According to statistics from the MOI's National Emergency Coordinating Center, during the year separatist violence resulted in the deaths of 510 individuals and the injury of 995 more in 935 incidents. The center also reported that at least 389 civilians were killed and 614 injured, 78 government officials were killed and 379 injured, and 43 insurgents were killed and one injured. As in previous years, the separatists frequently targeted government and religious representatives, including teachers, monks, and district and municipal officials, as well as Buddhist and Muslim civilians.
Some government-backed civilian defense volunteers, most of them ethnic Thai Buddhists from villages in the south, continued to receive basic training and weapons from the MOI and security forces. Human rights organizations expressed concerns about vigilantism against ethnic Malay Muslims by these defense volunteers and other civilians, suggesting they may have been involved in the June 8 mosque attack.
Police continued investigating the February 2007 attacks in Narathiwat, Pattani, Yala, and Songkhla that killed nine persons and injured approximately 70. Arrest warrants were issued for 13 suspects for the Narathiwat attacks; of those, two were arrested and were on trial at year's end. Two suspects were arrested and prosecuted for the attacks in Yala and were sentenced to life imprisonment. Authorities issued 15 arrest warrants for the March 2007 ambush of a van in Yala that killed eight Buddhist passengers. Five of the 15 suspects were killed during clashes with authorities at other locations, and four were arrested.
March 11, 2010
Thailand is a constitutional monarchy with a population of more than 66 million. The king is revered and exerts strong informal influence. In the most recent election for the lower house of the parliament, held in December 2007, the People's Power Party, led by Samak Sundaravej, won a plurality. After Constitutional Court rulings that forced two prime ministers to step down in 2008, a government led by Abhisit Vejjajiva was inaugurated in December 2008. In March 2008 voters elected 76 senators for the upper house of the parliament. The election process for both legislative bodies was generally viewed as free and fair, but there were widespread allegations of vote buying. The continuing internal conflict in the southernmost provinces led the government to restrict some rights and delegate certain internal security powers to the armed forces. Civilian authorities generally maintained effective control of the security forces.
The government's respect for human rights remained unchanged from the previous year. Security forces continued at times to use excessive force against criminal suspects, and there were reports that police tortured, beat, and otherwise abused suspects, detainees, and prisoners, many of whom were held in overcrowded and unsanitary conditions. There were numerous dismissals, arrests, prosecutions, and convictions of security forces in response to this behavior; however, official impunity continued to be a serious problem. Police corruption was widespread. A separatist insurgency in the southern part of the country resulted in numerous human rights abuses, including killings, committed by ethnic Malay Muslim insurgents, Buddhist defense volunteers, and government security forces. The government maintained some limits on freedom of speech, of the press, and of assembly. Human rights workers, particularly those focusing on violence in the south, reported harassment and intimidation. Trafficking in persons remained a problem. Members of hill tribes without proper documentation continued to face restrictions on their movement, could not own land, and were not protected by labor laws. Government enforcement of labor laws was ineffective.
Political unrest occurred in March and April in Pattaya and Bangkok, when opposition street protests led to the cancellation of an Asian summit in Pattaya and riots in Bangkok, with two civilians killed by antigovernment protesters. The government declared a state of emergency in the Pattaya area on April 11 and in Bangkok on April 12, and the military restored order in Bangkok on April 13-14.
RESPECT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS
Section 1 Respect for the Integrity of the Person, Including Freedom From:
a. Arbitrary or Unlawful Deprivation of Life
There were no confirmed reports that the government or its agents committed any politically motivated killings; however, security forces occasionally used excessive and at times lethal force against criminal suspects and committed or were connected to extrajudicial, arbitrary, and unlawful killings, including killings by security force personnel acting in a private capacity. Government law enforcement bodies and courts took action in some cases, including suspected extrajudicial killings by police in Kalasin Province.
According to the Ministry of Interior's (MOI) Investigation and Legal Affairs Bureau, between January and November, 733 persons died in prison and 24 while in police custody. Authorities attributed most of the deaths to natural causes. Police killed 50 suspects during the arrest process.
By year's end no member of Task Force 39 had been charged in connection with the death of Imam Yapa Koseng while in army custody in March 2008. There were three lawsuits pending in the case: the potential criminal proceeding against the military suspects, under consideration by the National Counter-Corruption Commission (NCCC) since June 2008; the civil lawsuit filed by Yapa's family in March against the Ministry of Defense, Royal Thai Army (RTA), and Royal Thai Police (RTP) that was put on hold pending the resolution of a jurisdictional problem; and a criminal lawsuit filed on August 20 by the family against the alleged perpetrators.
There were no developments in the 2007 death of Nopphon Chaiwichit in Nakhon Si Thammarat Province. At year's end the Crime Suppression Police Division in Bangkok continued its investigation.
At year's end the case of the 2007 shooting by Preecha Panpayap, a MOI security official, in Mae Hong Son Province that killed Karenni refugee Aie Oo had not reached the prosecution or trial stage. On January 27, authorities forwarded the matter to the provincial police, which established an investigatory committee but made no determination. The governor of Mae Hong Son brought the case to the Office of the Attorney General (OAG) in June 2008. In November the OAG decided that it would not prosecute Preecha for deliberate homicide.The Department of Special Investigation's (DSI) Special Case Center accepted for investigation 10 cases suspected of being related to the 2003 "War on Drugs" campaign for investigation, although the killings occurred after 2003. The DSI forwarded eight of the cases to the OAG and one to the NCCC, and it continued to investigate one case. The DSI issued warrants for six police officers in Kalasin Province in relation to the killing of Kiattisak Thitboonkhrong and the subsequent cover-up. In August the DSI submitted a brief to the state prosecutor; on September 9, the prosecutor filed criminal charges, including a charge of abuse of power for the three commissioned officers involved.
In October several police officers and civilians exhausted their appeals in relation to the kidnapping and murder of the wife and son of jeweler Santi Sithanakhan during the investigation of the Saudi Arabian palace jewel theft in 1994. The Supreme Court upheld the death sentence of former police commissioner Chalo Koetthet for masterminding the scheme. Similarly, it upheld the life sentences received by one police officer and two civilians. As for the remaining defendants, another officer and a civilian died in prison, the last two civilians received minor sentences, and a final officer was acquitted.
According to the Thailand Mine Action Center, during the year there were 10 injuries due to landmines, occurring in Buriram, Kanchanaburi, Sakaew, Sisaket, and Trat provinces. The government continued significant public awareness campaigns, including sending landmine awareness teams to the affected villages and landmine education teams to local schools to inform students about the risk and prevention of landmine injury.
There were at least four violent incidents between Thai border rangers and Cambodian illegal loggers during the year. For example, on September 11, border rangers shot at a group of Cambodians illegally logging on the Thai side of the border in Surin Province. One Cambodian was killed and another wounded in the incident. On November 27, border rangers allegedly shot and killed one individual among a group of seven Cambodian illegal loggers in Kap Cheung District, also in Surin Province.
b. Disappearance
There were no reports of politically motivated disappearances. There were no confirmed reports that individuals disappeared after being questioned by security officials in the southern provinces.
On December 11 in Narathiwat Province, relatives reported that Abduloh Abukaree disappeared after failing to return home from a nearby tea shop. He was a key witness in a DSI case against high-ranking police officials, connected to the disappearance of Somchai Neelaphaijit (see below).
There were no developments in the February 2008 case of Kamol Laosophaphant, a businessman in Khon Kaen Province who disappeared after going to a police station to lodge criminal complaints against local officials concerning state railway land deals. However, the DSI accepted it as a special case and was investigating it.
Utsaman Awaenu, a navy draftee stationed in Sattahip, Chonburi Province, who disappeared in February 2008, was located in mid-2008 by his family with the assistance of the Muslim Attorney Center and the Cross Cultural Foundation.
There were no developments in the 2007 abduction of Anukorn Waithanomsak, an assistant to a leader of the United Front for Democracy Against Dictatorship (UDD).
On March 19, a civil court declared Muslim attorney and human rights activist Somchai Neelaphaijit legally missing, five years after his disappearance. In January his wife, Angkhana Neelaphaijit, met with Prime Minister (PM) Abhisit, who susbsequently pressured the DSI to pursue any remaining leads in the case. The DSI conducted several searches and declared there was no new evidence. In March the DSI stated that Police Major Ngern Thongsuk, convicted in 2007 of coercion for his role in forcing Somchai into a car, was living in a neighboring country and had not died in a September 2008 mudslide in Kanchanaburi Province as previously claimed. On March 11, Deputy PM Suthep Thaugsuban stated that those involved in Somchai's abduction would be prosecuted; however, at year's end no additional individuals had been charged. Somchai's disappearance in 2004 was thought to be connected to his legal representation of criminal suspects who allegedly had been tortured by high-ranking police officials. At year's end that case was before the NCCC, and one of the key witnesses, Abduloh Abukaree, disappeared on December 11, before he was able to testify.
c. Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
The constitution specifically prohibits such practices, but there is no law that specifically prohibits torture, and it is not punishable as an offense under criminal law. Nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and legal entities continued to report that members of the police and military occasionally tortured and beat suspects to obtain confessions. There were newspaper reports of numerous cases in which citizens accused police and other security officials of using brutality. At year's end no military personnel had been charged or prosecuted; however, there were criminal actions against RTP officers.
RTP Captain Nat Chonnithiwat and seven other police officers in the 41st Border Patrol Police unit were convicted by two separate Bangkok courts on charges of assault, illegal detention, extortion, and receiving bribes. Many of the victims were beaten, subjected to electric shock, and had plastic bags placed over their heads to force them to confess. Others were forced to pay bribes of cash and jewelry to have charges reduced against them. At least 61 individuals filed complaints against these officers; in July they were sentenced to three years in prison, and in December they were sentenced to an additional five years.
The RTP continued its investigation of the January 2008 alleged torture of university students Ismael Tae and Amisi Manak by Yala's Task Force ll and soldiers from a camp in Pattani. The relatives of the victims also filed a civil suit against the RTA, which was pending at year's end.
Prison and Detention Center Conditions
Prison conditions were poor. Prisons and detention centers were overcrowded. There were approximately 200,000 prisoners in prisons and detention facilities designed to hold 100,000. Sleeping accommodations were insufficient, medical care was inadequate, and communicable diseases were widespread in some prisons. Seriously ill prisoners at times were transferred to provincial or state hospitals.
Prison authorities sometimes used solitary confinement of not more than one month, as permitted by law, to punish male prisoners who consistently violated prison rules or regulations, although the Department of Corrections maintained that the average confinement was approximately seven days. Authorities also used heavy leg irons to control prisoners who were deemed escape risks or harmful to other prisoners.
Approximately 14 percent of the prison population consisted of pretrial detainees, who were not segregated from the general prison population. Men, women, and children often were held together in police station cells pending indictment. Separate facilities for juvenile offenders were available in all provinces. In rare instances juveniles were detained with adults.
Conditions in immigration detention centers (IDCs) remained poor. The Immigration Police Bureau, reporting to the Office of the Prime Minister, administered IDCs, which were not subject to many of the regulations that governed the regular prison system. There were reports that guards physically abused detainees in some IDCs. Overcrowding and a lack of basic medical care continued to be serious problems. There were also complaints of inadequate and culturally inappropriate food, especially by Muslim detainees.
International observers reported continued overcrowded conditions for detainees in Bangkok's Suan Phlu IDC. Observers alleged that detainees were abused while in detention. There were reports that detainees, including children, were not permitted to exercise at some facilities.
Access to prisons was not restricted, and the government permitted visits by independent human rights observers and the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). ICRC representatives were allowed to meet prisoners without third parties present and made repeated visits. However, at year's end the military had not approved ICRC requests to visit military detention facilities in the four southernmost provinces, where detainees allegedly were mistreated. Authorities also continued to deny the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) access to detainees at the Suvarnabhumi Airport IDC in Bangkok. UNHCR officials were able to interview detainees in Suan Phlu IDC, and access for third countries to process recognized refugees for resettlement continued.d. Arbitrary Arrest or Detention
The constitution specifically prohibits arbitrary arrest and detention; however, government forces occasionally arrested and detained persons arbitrarily. Martial law, which gives the military authority to detain persons without charge for a maximum of seven days, remained in force in 31 of the country's 76 provinces.
The Lawyers' Council of Thailand (LCT) received 115 complaints during the year from residents of the southern provinces about security force operations, including improper searches and arrests made by citing the emergency decree and presenting warrants afterwards.
Role of the Police and Security Apparatus
The RTP has the authority to minimize threats to internal security and suppress criminal activity. It is under the direct supervision of the prime minister and a 20-member police commission. The police commissioner general is appointed by the prime minister and subject to cabinet and royal approval. The Border Patrol Police has special authority and responsibility in border areas to combat insurgent or separatist movements.
The February 2008 implementation of the Internal Security Act (ISA) created the Internal Security Operations Command (ISOC) as a state agency under the command of the prime minster, who acts as the ISOC director. The act includes broad powers for the military. Military and civilian personnel make up the ISOC staff; ISOC is intended to function as a national security force to suppress unrest. The ISA was invoked in July for the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Regional Forum in Phuket and repeatedly in the fall for UDD rallies. Human rights organizations and academics criticized the government for repeatedly utilizing the ISA, with approval of the cabinet, to respond to alleged threats to national security by restricting fundamental rights. However, invocation of the ISA did not prevent peaceful assembly of protesters.
Corruption remained widespread among members of the police force. There were numerous incidents of police charged with sexual harassment, theft, and malfeasance. There were reports that police tortured, beat, and otherwise abused detainees and prisoners, generally with impunity. Police officers were arrested for drug trafficking, reportedly involved with intellectual property rights violations, and convicted on extortion charges.
In certain regions and situations where the military plays a security role, soldiers were arrested and charged with drug trafficking and arms trafficking. In July the RTA dismissed 38 noncommissioned officers for fraud and extortion for demanding money for rank and duty promotions.
There were press reports that former police chief Patcharawat Wongsuwan interfered in the investigation of the April attempted killing of People's Alliance for Democracy leader Sondhi Limthongkul. In July arrest warrants were issued for two soldiers and a police officer. In October the NCCC charged Patcharawat with malfeasance for his handling of the violent crackdown on the October 2008 political protesters, leading PM Abhisit to transfer him. The case was forwarded to the OAG but then moved to a joint NCCC-OAG committee in November; at year's end it had not been resolved.
Complaints of police abuse can be filed directly with the superior of the accused police officer, the Office of the Inspector General, or the police commissioner general. The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), LCT, NCCC, Court of Justice, Ministry of Justice (MOJ), and Office of the Prime Minister also accept complaints of police abuse and corruption, as does the Office of the Ombudsman. At year's end there were 22 petitions pending with the LCT seeking assistance to pursue abuse of power cases against the police.
When the police department receives a complaint, an internal investigation committee first takes up the matter and may temporarily suspend the officer during the investigation. Various administrative penalties exist, and serious cases can be referred to a criminal court. The NHRC received approximately 95 complaints of police abuse between October 2008 and the end of the year.
Procedures for investigating suspicious deaths, including deaths occurring in police custody, require that a prosecutor, forensic pathologist, and local administrator participate in the investigation and that in most cases family members have legal representation at the inquests. However, these procedures often were not followed. Families rarely took advantage of a provision in the law that allows them to bring personal lawsuits against police officers for criminal action during arrests.
Arrest Procedures and Treatment While in Detention
With few exceptions, the law requires police to obtain a warrant from a judge prior to making an arrest. In practice the system for issuing arrest warrants was subject to misuse by police officers and a tendency by the courts automatically to approve all requests for warrants. By law persons must be informed of likely charges against them immediately after arrest and must be allowed to inform someone of their arrest. The law provides for access to counsel for criminal detainees; however, lawyers and human rights groups claimed that police often conducted interrogations without providing access to an attorney. Lawyers working in the southern provinces reported that under the emergency decree they were denied adequate access to detained clients, and some individuals in the southern provinces reported they were denied permission to visit detained family members. Foreign detainees sometimes were pressured to sign confessions without the benefit of a competent translator. The MOJ and OAG sought to provide an attorney to indigent detainees at public expense.
Under normal conditions the law allows police to detain criminal suspects for 48 hours after arrest for investigation. Court permission is required to extend detentions for additional periods (up to a maximum of 84 days for the most serious offenses) to conduct investigations. Lawyers reported that police rarely brought cases to court within the 48-hour period. Laws and regulations place offenses for which the maximum penalty is less than three years under the jurisdiction of the district courts, which have different procedures. In these cases police are required to submit cases to public prosecutors within 72 hours of arrest. According to the LCT, pretrial detention of criminal suspects for up to 60 days was common.
The law provides defendants the right to bail, and the government generally respected this right. However, some human rights groups reported that police frequently either did not inform detained suspects of their right to bail or refused to recommend bail after a request was submitted. There were several instances of denial of bail in lese majeste cases; both Boonyuen Prasertying and Suwicha Thakhor were denied bail for three months between their arrests and guilty pleas. In July 2008 police arrested activist Daranee Charnchoengsilpakul (also known as Da Torpedo) on lese majeste charges following speeches at UDD rallies. The court refused her bail on several occasions, and she remained in detention for more than a year before she was sentenced on August 28.
Under martial law the military has the authority to detain persons without charge for a maximum of seven days.
Amnesty
Early in the year, authorities completed the release of 31,149 prisoners pardoned by the king as part of a royal amnesty marking his 80th birthday in 2007.
e. Denial of Fair Public Trial
The constitution provides for an independent judiciary. Although the judiciary generally was regarded as independent, it was subject to corruption and outside influences. According to human rights groups, the lack of progress in several high-profile cases involving alleged abuse by the police and military diminished the public's trust in the justice system and discouraged some victims of human rights abuses (or their families) from seeking justice.
The civilian judicial system has three levels of courts: courts of first instance, courts of appeal, and the Supreme Court of Justice. In addition there is a Constitutional Court, charged with interpreting the constitution, and the Administrative Court, which adjudicates cases involving government officials or state agencies. Justices nominated to the Supreme Administrative Court are confirmed by the Senate after being recruited by a judicial commission consisting of 10 judges and three officials appointed by the Senate and the cabinet. Other judges are career civil servants whose appointments are not subject to parliamentary review.
A separate military court hears criminal and civil cases pertaining to military personnel as well as those brought during periods of martial law. Islamic (Shari'a) courts hear only civil cases concerning family and inheritance matters between Muslim parties in Yala, Pattani, Narathiwat, and Satun provinces.
Trial Procedures
There is no trial by jury. A single judge decides trials for misdemeanors; two or more judges are required for more serious cases. The constitution provides for a prompt trial, although a large backlog of cases remained in the court system. While most trials are public, the court may order a closed trial, particularly in cases involving national security, the royal family, children, or sexual abuse. NGOs criticized the closure of the trial of political activist Daranee Charnchoengsilpakul in June, which resulted in an 18-year sentence. Her attorneys appealed the constitutionality of the trial closure; in December the Constitutional Court declined to accept the petition, reasoning that her conviction could be overturned by either the appeals court or the Supreme Court.
The law provides for the presumption of innocence. In ordinary criminal courts, defendants enjoy a broad range of legal rights, including access to a lawyer of their choosing. A government program sought to provide free legal advice to the poor, but indigent defendants were not automatically provided with counsel at public expense. The MOJ and the OAG remained committed to providing legal aid in both civil and criminal cases but did not allocate sufficient resources. The LCT budget was reduced by more than 25 percent in the year. The legal aid provided was often done on a pro bono, ad hoc basis, and it was of a low standard. Some NGOs reported that legal aid lawyers pressured their clients into paying additional fees directly to them. The court is required to appoint an attorney in cases where the defendant disputes the charges, is indigent, or is a minor, as well as in cases where the possible punishment is more than five years' imprisonment or death. Most free legal aid came from private groups, including the LCT and the Thai Women Lawyers Association. There is no discovery process; consequently, lawyers and defendants do not have access to evidence prior to the trial. The law provides for access to courts or administrative bodies to seek redress, and the government generally respected this right.
Several NGOs expressed concern over the lack of adequate protection for witnesses, particularly in cases involving alleged police wrongdoing. The MOJ's Office of Witness Protection had limited resources and primarily played a coordinating role. In most cases witness protection was provided by the police, but six other state agencies participated in the program. Witnesses, lawyers, and activists involved in cases of alleged police abuse reported that protection was inadequate and that they were intimidated by the police sent to provide protection.
There were no reports of political prisoners or detainees.
Civil Judicial Procedures and Remedies
There is an independent and impartial judiciary in civil matters. The law provides for access to courts and administrative bodies to bring lawsuits seeking damages for, or cessation of, a human rights violation, and the government generally respected this right. However, sections 16 and 17 of the emergency decree, which was in force in the three southern border provinces, expressly exclude scrutiny by the Administrative Court or civil or criminal proceedings against government officials, although victims may seek compensation from a government agency instead.
f. Arbitrary Interference with Privacy, Family, Home, or Correspondence
The constitution specifically prohibits such actions, and the government generally respected these prohibitions in practice. However, martial law gives military forces the authority to conduct searches without a warrant, and this authority was used on some occasions. In addition, the emergency decree covering the southern provinces also allows authorities to make searches and arrests without warrants. The LCT received multiple complaints from persons in the south claiming that security forces abused this authority, but the decree provides security forces broad immunity from prosecution.
Security services monitored persons, including foreign visitors, who espoused extremist or highly controversial views.
In contrast with 2008, there were no reports that police conducted warrantless searches in the northern provinces or that members of indigenous hill tribes were subjected to forced evictions and relocations.
g. Use of Excessive Force and Other Abuses in Internal Conflict
The internal conflict in the ethnic Malay, Muslim-majority, southernmost provinces (Narathiwat, Pattani, Yala, and portions of Songkhla) continued throughout the year. Insurgents carried out almost daily bombings and attacks that caused deaths and injuries. The emergency decree in effect in this area gives military, police, and civilian authorities significant powers to restrict certain basic rights and delegated certain internal security powers to the armed forces. The decree also provides security forces broad immunity from prosecution. The 2006 martial law, which also remained in effect in the provinces of Narathiwat, Pattani, and Yala, gives a wide range of power to security forces.
Killings
Human rights groups accused government forces of extrajudicial killings, arbitrary arrests, and torture of individuals suspected of involvement with separatists. As a result of a series of attacks by suspected insurgents, tension between the local ethnic Malay Muslim and ethnic Thai Buddhist communities continued to grow, alongside a distrust of security officials.
On March 12, suspected insurgents shot prominent human rights activist Laila Paaitae Daoh in Krongpenang, Yala. Laila, who died from her injuries the next day, was the fourth family member to be killed for advocating a peaceful solution to the southern problem. Laila's husband and second son were killed in 2006, and her eldest son was shot and killed in 2004.
On June 8, gunmen opened fire inside the Al Furqon mosque in Narathiwat, killing 10 and injuring 12. Police issued an arrest warrant for a former paramilitary member, Sutthirak Kongsuwan, who was related to a Buddhist villager killed the day before in the neighboring district. Police later issued a second warrant for the alleged getaway driver. Insurgents killed a pregnant Buddhist schoolteacher in the same district earlier that week.
On June 12, gunmen shot two Buddhist monks in Yala while they collected morning alms, killing one and seriously wounding the other.
In February the OAG decided not to pursue criminal charges against any officials involved in the 2004 Krue Se massacre, ending the inquest started in 2007.
On May 29, the Songkhla Provincial Court announced its verdict on the inquest into the deaths of 78 ethnic Malay Muslim detainees at Tak Bai in 2004. The court determined that officers were performing their duty and were not responsible based on the immunity granted them through provisions in the emergency decree.
According to statistics from the MOI's National Emergency Coordinating Center, during the year separatist violence resulted in the deaths of 510 individuals and the injury of 995 more in 935 incidents. The center also reported that at least 389 civilians were killed and 614 injured, 78 government officials were killed and 379 injured, and 43 insurgents were killed and one injured. As in previous years, the separatists frequently targeted government and religious representatives, including teachers, monks, and district and municipal officials, as well as Buddhist and Muslim civilians.
Some government-backed civilian defense volunteers, most of them ethnic Thai Buddhists from villages in the south, continued to receive basic training and weapons from the MOI and security forces. Human rights organizations expressed concerns about vigilantism against ethnic Malay Muslims by these defense volunteers and other civilians, suggesting they may have been involved in the June 8 mosque attack.
Police continued investigating the February 2007 attacks in Narathiwat, Pattani, Yala, and Songkhla that killed nine persons and injured approximately 70. Arrest warrants were issued for 13 suspects for the Narathiwat attacks; of those, two were arrested and were on trial at year's end. Two suspects were arrested and prosecuted for the attacks in Yala and were sentenced to life imprisonment. Authorities issued 15 arrest warrants for the March 2007 ambush of a van in Yala that killed eight Buddhist passengers. Five of the 15 suspects were killed during clashes with authorities at other locations, and four were arrested.
THAILAND History...
THAILAND
Southeast Asia has been inhabited for more than half a million years. Recent archaeological studies suggest that by 4000 BC, communities in what is now Thailand had emerged as centers of early bronze metallurgy. This development, along with the cultivation of wet rice, provided the impetus for social and political organization. Research suggests that these innovations may actually have been transmitted from there to the rest of Asia, including to China.
The Thai are related linguistically to Tai groups originating in southern China. Migrations from southern China to Southeast Asia may have occurred in the 6th and 7th centuries. Malay, Mon, and Khmer civilizations flourished in the region prior to the arrival of the ethnic Tai.
Thais date the founding of their nation to the 13th century. According to tradition, in 1238, Thai chieftains overthrew their Khmer overlords at Sukhothai and established a Thai kingdom. After its decline, a new Thai kingdom emerged in 1350 on the Chao Praya River. At the same time, there was an equally important Tai kingdom of Lanna, centered in Chiang Mai, which rivaled Sukothai and Ayutthaya for centuries, and which defines northern Thai identity to this day.
The first ruler of the Kingdom of Ayutthaya, King Rama Thibodi, made two important contributions to Thai history: the establishment and promotion of Theravada Buddhism as the official religion--to differentiate his kingdom from the neighboring Hindu kingdom of Angkor--and the compilation of the Dharmashastra, a legal code based on Hindu sources and traditional Thai custom. The Dharmashastra remained a tool of Thai law until late in the 19th century. Beginning with the Portuguese in the 16th century, Ayutthaya had some contact with the West, but until the 1800s, its relations with neighboring kingdoms and principalities, as well as with China, were of primary importance.
After more than 400 years of power, in 1767, the Kingdom of Ayutthaya was brought down by invading Burmese armies and its capital burned. After a single-reign capital established at Thonburi by Taksin, a new capital city was founded in 1782, across the Chao Phraya at the site of present-day Bangkok, by the founder of the Chakri dynasty. The first Chakri king was crowned Rama I. Rama's heirs became increasingly concerned with the threat of European colonialism after British victories in neighboring Burma in 1826.
The first Thai recognition of Western power in the region was the Treaty of Amity and Commerce with the United Kingdom in 1826. In 1833, the United States began diplomatic exchanges with Siam, as Thailand was called until 1938. However, it was during the later reigns of Rama IV (or King Mongkut, 1851-68), and his son Rama V (King Chulalongkorn (1868-1910), that Thailand established firm rapprochement with Western powers. The Thais believe that the diplomatic skills of these monarchs, combined with the modernizing reforms of the Thai Government, made Siam the only country in South and Southeast Asia to avoid European colonization.
In 1932, a bloodless coup transformed the Government of Thailand from an absolute to a constitutional monarchy. King Prajadhipok (Rama VII) initially accepted this change but later surrendered the kingship to his 10-year-old nephew. Upon his abdication, King Prajadhipok said that the obligation of a ruler was to reign for the good of the whole people, not for a select few. Although nominally a constitutional monarchy, Thailand was ruled by a series of military governments interspersed with brief periods of democracy from that time until the 1992 elections. Since the 1992 elections, Thailand has been a functioning democracy with constitutional changes of government.
As with the rest of Southeast Asia, Thailand was occupied by the Japanese during the Second World War. Since Japan's defeat in 1945, Thailand has had very close relations with the United States. Threatened by communist revolutions in neighboring countries such as Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos, Thailand actively sought to contain communist expansion in the region. Recently, Thailand also has been an active member in multilateral organizations like the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) and the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) forum.
The king has little direct power under the constitution but is a symbol of national identity and unity. King Bhumibol--who has been on the throne since 1946--commands enormous popular respect and moral authority, which he has used on occasion to resolve political crises that have threatened national stability.
Thailand's legal system blends principles of traditional Thai and Western laws. The Constitutional Court is the highest court of appeals, though its jurisdiction is limited to clearly defined constitutional issues. Its members are nominated by the Senate and appointed by the King. The Courts of Justice have jurisdiction over criminal and civil cases and are organized in three tiers: Courts of First Instance, the Court of Appeals, and the Supreme Court of Justice. Administrative courts have jurisdiction over suits between private parties and the government, and cases in which one government entity is suing another. In Thailand's southern border provinces, where Muslims constitute the majority of the population, Provincial Islamic Committees have limited jurisdiction over probate, family, marriage, and divorce cases.
The National Assembly consists of two chambers--the Senate and the House of Representatives. The Senate is a non-partisan body with limited legislative powers, composed of 200 directly elected members from constituent districts, with every province having at least one Senator. The House of Representatives has 500 members, 400 of whom are directly elected from constituent districts, and the remainder drawn proportionally from party lists.
Thailand's 76 provinces include the metropolis of greater Bangkok. Bangkok's governor is popularly elected, but those of the remaining provinces are career civil servants appointed by the Ministry of Interior. Following the 1932 revolution which imposed constitutional limits on the monarchy, Thai politics was dominated for a half century by a military and bureaucratic elite. Changes of government were effected primarily by means of a long series of mostly bloodless coups.
Beginning with a brief experiment in democracy during the mid-1970s, civilian democratic political institutions slowly gained greater authority, culminating in 1988 when Chatichai Choonavan--leader of the Thai Nation Party--assumed office as the country's first democratically elected prime minister in more than a decade. Three years later, yet another bloodless coup ended his term.
Shortly afterward, the military appointed Anand Panyarachun, a businessman and former diplomat, to head a largely civilian interim government and promised to hold elections in the near future. However, following inconclusive elections, former army commander Suchinda Kraprayoon was appointed prime minister. Thais reacted to the appointment by demanding an end to military influence in government. Demonstrations were violently suppressed by the military; in May 1992, soldiers killed at least 50 protesters.
Domestic and international reaction to the violence forced Suchinda to resign, and the nation once again turned to Anand Panyarachun, who was named interim prime minister until new elections in September 1992. In those elections, the political parties that had opposed the military in May 1992 won by a narrow majority, and Chuan Leekpai, a leader of the Democratic Party, became Prime Minister. Chuan dissolved Parliament in May 1995, and the Thai Nation Party won the largest number of parliamentary seats in subsequent elections. Party leader Banharn Silpa-Archa became Prime Minister but held the office only little more than a year. Following elections held in November 1996, Chavalit Youngchaiyudh formed a coalition government and became Prime Minister. The onset of the Asian financial crisis caused a loss of confidence in the Chavalit government and forced him to hand over power to Chuan Leekpai in November 1997. Chuan formed a coalition government based on the themes of prudent economic management and institution of political reforms mandated by Thailand's 1997 constitution.
In the January 2001 elections, telecommunications multimillionaire Thaksin Shinawatra and his Thai Rak Thai (TRT) party won an overwhelming victory on a populist platform of economic growth and development. TRT enjoys an absolute majority in the lower house of the Parliament, controlling 365 of 500 seats. In a cabinet reshuffle of October 2002, the Thaksin administration further put its stamp on the government. A package of bureaucratic reform legislation created six new ministries in an effort to streamline the bureaucratic process and increase efficiency and accountability. Parliamentary elections are expected in February 2011...
Southeast Asia has been inhabited for more than half a million years. Recent archaeological studies suggest that by 4000 BC, communities in what is now Thailand had emerged as centers of early bronze metallurgy. This development, along with the cultivation of wet rice, provided the impetus for social and political organization. Research suggests that these innovations may actually have been transmitted from there to the rest of Asia, including to China.
The Thai are related linguistically to Tai groups originating in southern China. Migrations from southern China to Southeast Asia may have occurred in the 6th and 7th centuries. Malay, Mon, and Khmer civilizations flourished in the region prior to the arrival of the ethnic Tai.
Thais date the founding of their nation to the 13th century. According to tradition, in 1238, Thai chieftains overthrew their Khmer overlords at Sukhothai and established a Thai kingdom. After its decline, a new Thai kingdom emerged in 1350 on the Chao Praya River. At the same time, there was an equally important Tai kingdom of Lanna, centered in Chiang Mai, which rivaled Sukothai and Ayutthaya for centuries, and which defines northern Thai identity to this day.
The first ruler of the Kingdom of Ayutthaya, King Rama Thibodi, made two important contributions to Thai history: the establishment and promotion of Theravada Buddhism as the official religion--to differentiate his kingdom from the neighboring Hindu kingdom of Angkor--and the compilation of the Dharmashastra, a legal code based on Hindu sources and traditional Thai custom. The Dharmashastra remained a tool of Thai law until late in the 19th century. Beginning with the Portuguese in the 16th century, Ayutthaya had some contact with the West, but until the 1800s, its relations with neighboring kingdoms and principalities, as well as with China, were of primary importance.
After more than 400 years of power, in 1767, the Kingdom of Ayutthaya was brought down by invading Burmese armies and its capital burned. After a single-reign capital established at Thonburi by Taksin, a new capital city was founded in 1782, across the Chao Phraya at the site of present-day Bangkok, by the founder of the Chakri dynasty. The first Chakri king was crowned Rama I. Rama's heirs became increasingly concerned with the threat of European colonialism after British victories in neighboring Burma in 1826.
The first Thai recognition of Western power in the region was the Treaty of Amity and Commerce with the United Kingdom in 1826. In 1833, the United States began diplomatic exchanges with Siam, as Thailand was called until 1938. However, it was during the later reigns of Rama IV (or King Mongkut, 1851-68), and his son Rama V (King Chulalongkorn (1868-1910), that Thailand established firm rapprochement with Western powers. The Thais believe that the diplomatic skills of these monarchs, combined with the modernizing reforms of the Thai Government, made Siam the only country in South and Southeast Asia to avoid European colonization.
In 1932, a bloodless coup transformed the Government of Thailand from an absolute to a constitutional monarchy. King Prajadhipok (Rama VII) initially accepted this change but later surrendered the kingship to his 10-year-old nephew. Upon his abdication, King Prajadhipok said that the obligation of a ruler was to reign for the good of the whole people, not for a select few. Although nominally a constitutional monarchy, Thailand was ruled by a series of military governments interspersed with brief periods of democracy from that time until the 1992 elections. Since the 1992 elections, Thailand has been a functioning democracy with constitutional changes of government.
As with the rest of Southeast Asia, Thailand was occupied by the Japanese during the Second World War. Since Japan's defeat in 1945, Thailand has had very close relations with the United States. Threatened by communist revolutions in neighboring countries such as Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos, Thailand actively sought to contain communist expansion in the region. Recently, Thailand also has been an active member in multilateral organizations like the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) and the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) forum.
The king has little direct power under the constitution but is a symbol of national identity and unity. King Bhumibol--who has been on the throne since 1946--commands enormous popular respect and moral authority, which he has used on occasion to resolve political crises that have threatened national stability.
Thailand's legal system blends principles of traditional Thai and Western laws. The Constitutional Court is the highest court of appeals, though its jurisdiction is limited to clearly defined constitutional issues. Its members are nominated by the Senate and appointed by the King. The Courts of Justice have jurisdiction over criminal and civil cases and are organized in three tiers: Courts of First Instance, the Court of Appeals, and the Supreme Court of Justice. Administrative courts have jurisdiction over suits between private parties and the government, and cases in which one government entity is suing another. In Thailand's southern border provinces, where Muslims constitute the majority of the population, Provincial Islamic Committees have limited jurisdiction over probate, family, marriage, and divorce cases.
The National Assembly consists of two chambers--the Senate and the House of Representatives. The Senate is a non-partisan body with limited legislative powers, composed of 200 directly elected members from constituent districts, with every province having at least one Senator. The House of Representatives has 500 members, 400 of whom are directly elected from constituent districts, and the remainder drawn proportionally from party lists.
Thailand's 76 provinces include the metropolis of greater Bangkok. Bangkok's governor is popularly elected, but those of the remaining provinces are career civil servants appointed by the Ministry of Interior. Following the 1932 revolution which imposed constitutional limits on the monarchy, Thai politics was dominated for a half century by a military and bureaucratic elite. Changes of government were effected primarily by means of a long series of mostly bloodless coups.
Beginning with a brief experiment in democracy during the mid-1970s, civilian democratic political institutions slowly gained greater authority, culminating in 1988 when Chatichai Choonavan--leader of the Thai Nation Party--assumed office as the country's first democratically elected prime minister in more than a decade. Three years later, yet another bloodless coup ended his term.
Shortly afterward, the military appointed Anand Panyarachun, a businessman and former diplomat, to head a largely civilian interim government and promised to hold elections in the near future. However, following inconclusive elections, former army commander Suchinda Kraprayoon was appointed prime minister. Thais reacted to the appointment by demanding an end to military influence in government. Demonstrations were violently suppressed by the military; in May 1992, soldiers killed at least 50 protesters.
Domestic and international reaction to the violence forced Suchinda to resign, and the nation once again turned to Anand Panyarachun, who was named interim prime minister until new elections in September 1992. In those elections, the political parties that had opposed the military in May 1992 won by a narrow majority, and Chuan Leekpai, a leader of the Democratic Party, became Prime Minister. Chuan dissolved Parliament in May 1995, and the Thai Nation Party won the largest number of parliamentary seats in subsequent elections. Party leader Banharn Silpa-Archa became Prime Minister but held the office only little more than a year. Following elections held in November 1996, Chavalit Youngchaiyudh formed a coalition government and became Prime Minister. The onset of the Asian financial crisis caused a loss of confidence in the Chavalit government and forced him to hand over power to Chuan Leekpai in November 1997. Chuan formed a coalition government based on the themes of prudent economic management and institution of political reforms mandated by Thailand's 1997 constitution.
In the January 2001 elections, telecommunications multimillionaire Thaksin Shinawatra and his Thai Rak Thai (TRT) party won an overwhelming victory on a populist platform of economic growth and development. TRT enjoys an absolute majority in the lower house of the Parliament, controlling 365 of 500 seats. In a cabinet reshuffle of October 2002, the Thaksin administration further put its stamp on the government. A package of bureaucratic reform legislation created six new ministries in an effort to streamline the bureaucratic process and increase efficiency and accountability. Parliamentary elections are expected in February 2011...
THAILAND Budget:...
THAILAND
GDP (2009): $539.7 billion.
Annual growth rate (2009): -2%Per capita income (2009): $8,100
Unemployment rate (2003): 2.2% of total labor force
Budget: Income .............. $40.9 Billion
Expenditure ... $51.5 Billion
Main Crops: Rice, cassava (tapioca), rubber, corn, sugarcane, coconuts, soybeans.
Natural Resources: Tin, rubber, natural gas, tungsten, tantalum, timber, lead, fish, gypsum, lignite, fluorite .
Major Industries: Tourism; textiles and garments, agricultural processing, beverages, tobacco, cement, light manufacturing, such as jewelry; electric appliances and components, computers and parts, integrated circuits, furniture, plastics; world's second-largest tungsten producer and third-largest tin producer .
GDP (2009): $539.7 billion.
Annual growth rate (2009): -2%Per capita income (2009): $8,100
Unemployment rate (2003): 2.2% of total labor force
Budget: Income .............. $40.9 Billion
Expenditure ... $51.5 Billion
Main Crops: Rice, cassava (tapioca), rubber, corn, sugarcane, coconuts, soybeans.
Natural Resources: Tin, rubber, natural gas, tungsten, tantalum, timber, lead, fish, gypsum, lignite, fluorite .
Major Industries: Tourism; textiles and garments, agricultural processing, beverages, tobacco, cement, light manufacturing, such as jewelry; electric appliances and components, computers and parts, integrated circuits, furniture, plastics; world's second-largest tungsten producer and third-largest tin producer .
Thailand's population...
THAILAND
Thailand's population is relatively homogeneous. More than 85% speak a dialect of Thai and share a common culture. This core population includes the central Thai (36% of the population), Thai-Lao (32%), northern Thai (8%), and southern Thai (8%).
The language of the central Thai population is the language taught in schools and used in government. Several other small Thai-speaking groups include the Shan, Lue, and Phutai.
The largest minorities are the Chinese (about 12% of the population) and the Malay-speaking Muslims of the south (3%). Other groups include the Khmer, the Mon (who are substantially assimilated with the Thai), and the Vietnamese. Smaller, predominantly mountain-dwelling tribes, such as the Hmong, Karen, and Mein, number about 500,000.
POPULATION GRAPH
Population:
65,998,436
country comparison to the world: 20
note: estimates for this country explicitly take into account the effects of excess mortality due to AIDS; this can result in lower life expectancy, higher infant mortality, higher death rates, lower population growth rates, and changes in the distribution of population by age and sex than would otherwise be expected (July 2009 est.)
Age structure:
0-14 years: 20.8% (male 7,013,877/female 6,690,554)
15-64 years: 70.5% (male 23,000,156/female 23,519,298)
65 years and over: 8.7% (male 2,612,269/female 3,162,282) (2009 est.)
Median age:
total: 33.3 years
male: 32.4 years
female: 34.2 years (2009 est.)
Population growth rate:
0.626% (2009 est.)
country comparison to the world: 150
Birth rate:
13.38 births/1,000 population (2009 est.)
country comparison to the world: 156
Death rate:
7.12 deaths/1,000 population (July 2009 est.)
country comparison to the world: 128
Net migration rate:
NA (2009 est.)
Urbanization:
urban population: 33% of total population (2008)
rate of urbanization: 1.7% annual rate of change (2005-10 est.)
Sex ratio:
at birth: 1.05 male(s)/female
under 15 years: 1.05 male(s)/female
15-64 years: 0.98 male(s)/female
65 years and over: 0.83 male(s)/female
total population: 0.98 male(s)/female (2009 est.)
Infant mortality rate:
total: 17.48 deaths/1,000 live births
country comparison to the world: 114
male: 18.48 deaths/1,000 live births
female: 16.43 deaths/1,000 live births (2009 est.)
Life expectancy at birth:
total population: 73.1 years
country comparison to the world: 113
male: 70.77 years
female: 75.55 years (2009 est.)
Total fertility rate:
1.65 children born/woman (2009 est.)
country comparison to the world: 179
HIV/AIDS - adult prevalence rate:
1.4% (2007 est.)
country comparison to the world: 46
HIV/AIDS - people living with HIV/AIDS:
610,000 (2007 est.)
country comparison to the world: 18
HIV/AIDS - deaths:
30,000 (2007 est.)
country comparison to the world: 17
Major infectious diseases:
degree of risk: high
food or waterborne diseases: bacterial diarrhea
vectorborne diseases: dengue fever, Japanese encephalitis, and malaria
animal contact disease: rabies
water contact disease: leptospirosis
note: highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza has been identified in this country; it poses a negligible risk with extremely rare cases possible among US citizens who have close contact with birds (2009)
Nationality:
noun: Thai (singular and plural)
adjective: Thai
Ethnic groups:
Thai 75%, Chinese 14%, other 11%
Religions:
Buddhist 94.6%, Muslim 4.6%, Christian 0.7%, other 0.1% (2000 census)
Languages:
Thai, English (secondary language of the elite), ethnic and regional dialects
Literacy:
definition: age 15 and over can read and write
total population: 92.6%
male: 94.9%
female: 90.5% (2000 census)
School life expectancy (primary to tertiary education):
total: 14 years
male: 13 years
female: 14 years (2006)
Education expenditures:
4.2% of GDP (2005)
country comparison to the world: 99
Thailand's population is relatively homogeneous. More than 85% speak a dialect of Thai and share a common culture. This core population includes the central Thai (36% of the population), Thai-Lao (32%), northern Thai (8%), and southern Thai (8%).
The language of the central Thai population is the language taught in schools and used in government. Several other small Thai-speaking groups include the Shan, Lue, and Phutai.
The largest minorities are the Chinese (about 12% of the population) and the Malay-speaking Muslims of the south (3%). Other groups include the Khmer, the Mon (who are substantially assimilated with the Thai), and the Vietnamese. Smaller, predominantly mountain-dwelling tribes, such as the Hmong, Karen, and Mein, number about 500,000.
POPULATION GRAPH
Population:
65,998,436
country comparison to the world: 20
note: estimates for this country explicitly take into account the effects of excess mortality due to AIDS; this can result in lower life expectancy, higher infant mortality, higher death rates, lower population growth rates, and changes in the distribution of population by age and sex than would otherwise be expected (July 2009 est.)
Age structure:
0-14 years: 20.8% (male 7,013,877/female 6,690,554)
15-64 years: 70.5% (male 23,000,156/female 23,519,298)
65 years and over: 8.7% (male 2,612,269/female 3,162,282) (2009 est.)
Median age:
total: 33.3 years
male: 32.4 years
female: 34.2 years (2009 est.)
Population growth rate:
0.626% (2009 est.)
country comparison to the world: 150
Birth rate:
13.38 births/1,000 population (2009 est.)
country comparison to the world: 156
Death rate:
7.12 deaths/1,000 population (July 2009 est.)
country comparison to the world: 128
Net migration rate:
NA (2009 est.)
Urbanization:
urban population: 33% of total population (2008)
rate of urbanization: 1.7% annual rate of change (2005-10 est.)
Sex ratio:
at birth: 1.05 male(s)/female
under 15 years: 1.05 male(s)/female
15-64 years: 0.98 male(s)/female
65 years and over: 0.83 male(s)/female
total population: 0.98 male(s)/female (2009 est.)
Infant mortality rate:
total: 17.48 deaths/1,000 live births
country comparison to the world: 114
male: 18.48 deaths/1,000 live births
female: 16.43 deaths/1,000 live births (2009 est.)
Life expectancy at birth:
total population: 73.1 years
country comparison to the world: 113
male: 70.77 years
female: 75.55 years (2009 est.)
Total fertility rate:
1.65 children born/woman (2009 est.)
country comparison to the world: 179
HIV/AIDS - adult prevalence rate:
1.4% (2007 est.)
country comparison to the world: 46
HIV/AIDS - people living with HIV/AIDS:
610,000 (2007 est.)
country comparison to the world: 18
HIV/AIDS - deaths:
30,000 (2007 est.)
country comparison to the world: 17
Major infectious diseases:
degree of risk: high
food or waterborne diseases: bacterial diarrhea
vectorborne diseases: dengue fever, Japanese encephalitis, and malaria
animal contact disease: rabies
water contact disease: leptospirosis
note: highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza has been identified in this country; it poses a negligible risk with extremely rare cases possible among US citizens who have close contact with birds (2009)
Nationality:
noun: Thai (singular and plural)
adjective: Thai
Ethnic groups:
Thai 75%, Chinese 14%, other 11%
Religions:
Buddhist 94.6%, Muslim 4.6%, Christian 0.7%, other 0.1% (2000 census)
Languages:
Thai, English (secondary language of the elite), ethnic and regional dialects
Literacy:
definition: age 15 and over can read and write
total population: 92.6%
male: 94.9%
female: 90.5% (2000 census)
School life expectancy (primary to tertiary education):
total: 14 years
male: 13 years
female: 14 years (2006)
Education expenditures:
4.2% of GDP (2005)
country comparison to the world: 99
Δευτέρα 7 Ιουνίου 2010
Σάββατο 5 Ιουνίου 2010
Divorce. Divorce in Thailand History of Divorce...
Divorce
Divorce in Thailand
History of Divorce
Divorce in Thailand has many implications. Looking back in history, divorce has long existed in civilizations, dating back to at least ancient Mesopotamia. The ancient Athenians liberally allowed divorce but the person requesting divorce had to submit the request to a magistrate. The magistrate then would determine whether the reasons given were sufficient. Although liberally granted in ancient Greece, divorce was rare in early Roman culture. As the Roman grew in power and authority, however, Roman civil law embraced the maxim, “matrimonia debent esse libera” (“marriages ought to be free”), and either husband or wife could renounce the marriage at will.
Marriage was later considered to be within the realm of civil contracts and civil authorities gradually asserted their powers to decree divorces. Since there were no precedents defining the circumstances under which marriage could be dissolved, civil authorities relied heavily on the ecclesiastic courts.
Ask me about Divorce in Thailand...
Although the common law courts gradually assumed the power to dissolve marriages, the concept of divorce gradually became considered contrary to public policy. Over the years, these courts garnered immense control over the issuance of divorce and these precedents were largely influenced by the rise and fall of public mores of the time.
Why people divorce
An annual study in the UK by management consultants Grant Thornton estimates the main causes of divorce based on surveys of matrimonial lawyers.
The main causes in 2004 were:
-Extra-marital affairs - 27%
-Family Strains – 18%
-Emotional/Physical Abuse – 17%
-Mid-life Crisis – 13%
-Addictions, e.g. alcoholism and gambling – 6%
-Workaholism – 6%
According to this survey, men engaged in extra-marital affairs account for 75 % of the cases while women accounted for only 25%. In cases of family strain, women were the primary source which cited strain as their cause with 78% compared to 22% in men.
Emotional and physical abuse was more evenly split with women affected in 60% and men in 40% of cases. In workaholism-related divorces men accounted for 70% of the total while women made up the other 30%.
The 2004 survey found that 93% of divorce cases were petitioned by women, very few of which were contested. 53% of divorces were of marriages that had lasted 10-15 years, with 40% ending after 5 to 10 years. The first 5 years are relatively divorce-free, and if a marriage survives more than 20 years it is unlikely to end in divorce.
Divorce in Thailand
Under the Thai Civil and Commercial Code, divorce in Thailand is permitted in two categories:
By Mutual Consent: If you were married in Thailand at a local Registrar office (Khet or Amphoe), you may register an administrative divorce in Thailand. Divorce in Thailand by mutual consent must be made in writing and witnessed by at least two persons. You will need to show your marriage certificate, passport and the national I.D. card of the Thai citizen. The process can be completed in only one day at the local Register Office. This type of divorce is possible only if the couple has no disagreements over such issues as children or property (“uncontentested”.) A divorce certificate will be issued by the registrar Office.
By Court Judgment: If the divorce in Thailand is contested and one party is not present; you should proceed to the courts for a divorce “for cause”. Either the plaintiff or defendant (or both) must be a resident of Thailand. There are 12 grounds for divorce under Thai law. We strongly suggest that you consult a legal professional in these matters. If you are overseas, you may appoint a lawyer to initiate the procedure on your behalf. However, once a court date is set, you must appear in court in Thailand. Any documents not in Thai will need to be translated and notarized by your embassy in Bangkok. This process can take up to one year. Divorce certificates are usually obtained from the court where the divorce was granted.
Grounds for Divorce in Thailand
If one party will not agree to a divorce by mutual consent then you need to file with the courts for a divorce. In order to proceed with a divorce in this instance you will need to assert grounds for divorce and make personal appearance in court. Grounds for divorce in Thailand include the following circumstances:
1. a 3-year period of separation
2. One spouse has deserted the other for over one year
3. The husband has taken another woman as his wife
4. The wife has committed adultery
5. One spouse is guilty of misconduct (criminal or otherwise)
6. One spouse has physically or mentally harmed the other
7. Lack of Maintenance and Support
8. One spouse has had incurable insanity for at least 3 years
9. One spouse has broken the bond of good behavior
10. One spouse has an incurable, communicable and dangerous disease
11. One spouse has a physical disadvantage so as to be unable to cohabit as husband and wife.
Marriage outside of Thailand
If you were married outside of Thailand, you can only divorce according to the laws of the country concerned. It is possible to file for divorce in Thailand but only under certain circumstances involve the laws in your country of marriage, no conflict with the law in Thailand, your residency and the grounds for your divorce.
How to Divide the Property
Normally, under Thai law, any property that either had at the time before marriage otherwise referred to as personal property, remains with that party even though without a Thai prenuptial agreement. Any properties that both parties accrued after marriage, which is termed, “conjugal property” will be shared on an equal basis upon divorce. The actual rules are naturally more complex and Thai courts will usually divide the property in accordance with the law as well as individual circumstances. It is highly recommended that you have a prenuptial agreement drafted before you decide to marry as this maybe useful in protecting your personal property as mentioned above.
Debts and Liabilities
Any debts and liabilities that were accrued after the registration of marriage will be shared by both parties.
Child Custody
In regards to child custody or guardianship of the child, any party in the divorce can mutually agree on the terms of arrangement. This should be made in writing and then registered with the Registrar who will record it on the Memorandum of the Marriage Certificate. In the event that both parties cannot come to a mutual agreement, either party may pursue the case in court seeking custody or the rights of guardianship of the child.
Maintenance
The basic principle is that spouses shall maintain and support each other according to his or her ability and condition in life. With that in mind, where the divorce is granted on the grounds of physical or mental health, the spouse affected on this ground may apply to the Court for authorization to live apart while the danger persists and in such cases, the court may order a certain amount of maintenance to be furnished by one of the spouses to the other depending on individual circumstances.
If one of the parties becomes insane, irrespective of whether he or she has been adjudged incompetent or not, and the other spouse fails to give proper maintenance to the insane spouse, a guardian may enter an action against the other claiming maintenance for the insane spouse, or apply for any order of the Court to protect the insane spouse.
In other words, the courts have a wide discretion whether to attach maintenance measures in divorces in Thailand.
How to Safeguard your Assets
Prenuptial Agreement
As it is often said, this agreement will let you determine in advance how your assets and debts would be handled in the event of dissolution of marriage. If you end up needing your prenuptial agreement to be enforced by the court, it is wise to make the agreement reasonable from the beginning (and therefore enforceable). For example, a provision of reasonable support structure for your spouse in the event of a divorce. This agreement defines the support limit, terms, amount and duration. If you left it up to a court, you would have little control over any of the terms.
Lease or Usufruct Agreement
When a foreigner along with his/her Thai spouse purchases land in Thailand, the foreign spouse must appear at the Land Department to sign a declaration stating that the funds used for the purchase belongs entirely to the Thai spouse. Therefore, the land is not part of any settlement should there be subsequently a divorce. In order for the foreign spouse to safeguard this financial investment in the property, a lease or usufruct agreement should be prepared allowing him the right to reside on the land. A lease agreement can be made for 90 years (initial registration of 30 years at the Land Department with two renewal periods). A usufruct agreement will allow the foreign spouse the rights to occupy the property either for 30 years or his lifetime. Under these two agreements, the foreign spouse will have his name recorded on the back of the Land Title Deed.
Conclusion
A divorce in Thailand is very difficult, and the financial and emotional costs can be devastating. One of the best predictors of a better divorce outcome is the couple’s knowledge and understanding of their options. Many people do not fully educate themselves prior to the proceedings; either because they don’t want the divorce, they are hurt and overwhelmed, or that they believe that they understand what is expected. The result is that they often make decisions without fully understanding the consequences, including the potential damage that those decisions will have on their lives and the lives of their children.
Divorce in Thailand
History of Divorce
Divorce in Thailand has many implications. Looking back in history, divorce has long existed in civilizations, dating back to at least ancient Mesopotamia. The ancient Athenians liberally allowed divorce but the person requesting divorce had to submit the request to a magistrate. The magistrate then would determine whether the reasons given were sufficient. Although liberally granted in ancient Greece, divorce was rare in early Roman culture. As the Roman grew in power and authority, however, Roman civil law embraced the maxim, “matrimonia debent esse libera” (“marriages ought to be free”), and either husband or wife could renounce the marriage at will.
Marriage was later considered to be within the realm of civil contracts and civil authorities gradually asserted their powers to decree divorces. Since there were no precedents defining the circumstances under which marriage could be dissolved, civil authorities relied heavily on the ecclesiastic courts.
Ask me about Divorce in Thailand...
Although the common law courts gradually assumed the power to dissolve marriages, the concept of divorce gradually became considered contrary to public policy. Over the years, these courts garnered immense control over the issuance of divorce and these precedents were largely influenced by the rise and fall of public mores of the time.
Why people divorce
An annual study in the UK by management consultants Grant Thornton estimates the main causes of divorce based on surveys of matrimonial lawyers.
The main causes in 2004 were:
-Extra-marital affairs - 27%
-Family Strains – 18%
-Emotional/Physical Abuse – 17%
-Mid-life Crisis – 13%
-Addictions, e.g. alcoholism and gambling – 6%
-Workaholism – 6%
According to this survey, men engaged in extra-marital affairs account for 75 % of the cases while women accounted for only 25%. In cases of family strain, women were the primary source which cited strain as their cause with 78% compared to 22% in men.
Emotional and physical abuse was more evenly split with women affected in 60% and men in 40% of cases. In workaholism-related divorces men accounted for 70% of the total while women made up the other 30%.
The 2004 survey found that 93% of divorce cases were petitioned by women, very few of which were contested. 53% of divorces were of marriages that had lasted 10-15 years, with 40% ending after 5 to 10 years. The first 5 years are relatively divorce-free, and if a marriage survives more than 20 years it is unlikely to end in divorce.
Divorce in Thailand
Under the Thai Civil and Commercial Code, divorce in Thailand is permitted in two categories:
By Mutual Consent: If you were married in Thailand at a local Registrar office (Khet or Amphoe), you may register an administrative divorce in Thailand. Divorce in Thailand by mutual consent must be made in writing and witnessed by at least two persons. You will need to show your marriage certificate, passport and the national I.D. card of the Thai citizen. The process can be completed in only one day at the local Register Office. This type of divorce is possible only if the couple has no disagreements over such issues as children or property (“uncontentested”.) A divorce certificate will be issued by the registrar Office.
By Court Judgment: If the divorce in Thailand is contested and one party is not present; you should proceed to the courts for a divorce “for cause”. Either the plaintiff or defendant (or both) must be a resident of Thailand. There are 12 grounds for divorce under Thai law. We strongly suggest that you consult a legal professional in these matters. If you are overseas, you may appoint a lawyer to initiate the procedure on your behalf. However, once a court date is set, you must appear in court in Thailand. Any documents not in Thai will need to be translated and notarized by your embassy in Bangkok. This process can take up to one year. Divorce certificates are usually obtained from the court where the divorce was granted.
Grounds for Divorce in Thailand
If one party will not agree to a divorce by mutual consent then you need to file with the courts for a divorce. In order to proceed with a divorce in this instance you will need to assert grounds for divorce and make personal appearance in court. Grounds for divorce in Thailand include the following circumstances:
1. a 3-year period of separation
2. One spouse has deserted the other for over one year
3. The husband has taken another woman as his wife
4. The wife has committed adultery
5. One spouse is guilty of misconduct (criminal or otherwise)
6. One spouse has physically or mentally harmed the other
7. Lack of Maintenance and Support
8. One spouse has had incurable insanity for at least 3 years
9. One spouse has broken the bond of good behavior
10. One spouse has an incurable, communicable and dangerous disease
11. One spouse has a physical disadvantage so as to be unable to cohabit as husband and wife.
Marriage outside of Thailand
If you were married outside of Thailand, you can only divorce according to the laws of the country concerned. It is possible to file for divorce in Thailand but only under certain circumstances involve the laws in your country of marriage, no conflict with the law in Thailand, your residency and the grounds for your divorce.
How to Divide the Property
Normally, under Thai law, any property that either had at the time before marriage otherwise referred to as personal property, remains with that party even though without a Thai prenuptial agreement. Any properties that both parties accrued after marriage, which is termed, “conjugal property” will be shared on an equal basis upon divorce. The actual rules are naturally more complex and Thai courts will usually divide the property in accordance with the law as well as individual circumstances. It is highly recommended that you have a prenuptial agreement drafted before you decide to marry as this maybe useful in protecting your personal property as mentioned above.
Debts and Liabilities
Any debts and liabilities that were accrued after the registration of marriage will be shared by both parties.
Child Custody
In regards to child custody or guardianship of the child, any party in the divorce can mutually agree on the terms of arrangement. This should be made in writing and then registered with the Registrar who will record it on the Memorandum of the Marriage Certificate. In the event that both parties cannot come to a mutual agreement, either party may pursue the case in court seeking custody or the rights of guardianship of the child.
Maintenance
The basic principle is that spouses shall maintain and support each other according to his or her ability and condition in life. With that in mind, where the divorce is granted on the grounds of physical or mental health, the spouse affected on this ground may apply to the Court for authorization to live apart while the danger persists and in such cases, the court may order a certain amount of maintenance to be furnished by one of the spouses to the other depending on individual circumstances.
If one of the parties becomes insane, irrespective of whether he or she has been adjudged incompetent or not, and the other spouse fails to give proper maintenance to the insane spouse, a guardian may enter an action against the other claiming maintenance for the insane spouse, or apply for any order of the Court to protect the insane spouse.
In other words, the courts have a wide discretion whether to attach maintenance measures in divorces in Thailand.
How to Safeguard your Assets
Prenuptial Agreement
As it is often said, this agreement will let you determine in advance how your assets and debts would be handled in the event of dissolution of marriage. If you end up needing your prenuptial agreement to be enforced by the court, it is wise to make the agreement reasonable from the beginning (and therefore enforceable). For example, a provision of reasonable support structure for your spouse in the event of a divorce. This agreement defines the support limit, terms, amount and duration. If you left it up to a court, you would have little control over any of the terms.
Lease or Usufruct Agreement
When a foreigner along with his/her Thai spouse purchases land in Thailand, the foreign spouse must appear at the Land Department to sign a declaration stating that the funds used for the purchase belongs entirely to the Thai spouse. Therefore, the land is not part of any settlement should there be subsequently a divorce. In order for the foreign spouse to safeguard this financial investment in the property, a lease or usufruct agreement should be prepared allowing him the right to reside on the land. A lease agreement can be made for 90 years (initial registration of 30 years at the Land Department with two renewal periods). A usufruct agreement will allow the foreign spouse the rights to occupy the property either for 30 years or his lifetime. Under these two agreements, the foreign spouse will have his name recorded on the back of the Land Title Deed.
Conclusion
A divorce in Thailand is very difficult, and the financial and emotional costs can be devastating. One of the best predictors of a better divorce outcome is the couple’s knowledge and understanding of their options. Many people do not fully educate themselves prior to the proceedings; either because they don’t want the divorce, they are hurt and overwhelmed, or that they believe that they understand what is expected. The result is that they often make decisions without fully understanding the consequences, including the potential damage that those decisions will have on their lives and the lives of their children.
Child Custody. Child custody Thailand...
Child Custody
child custody Thailand.
Parental control is decided by the courts if the parties to the divorce in Thailand cannot agree. This is how it usually is done in Thailand during a divorce.
If the marriage is deemed to be void the parties may be able to agree about parental powers and monthly maintenance. This agreement would be made in writing. If no agreement can be reached, the courts will decide on parental control and maintenance. If however there is reason to deprive one of the spouses of parental control under Section 1582 the courts may appoint a guardian. Parental control may be deprived of someone who has been declared incompetent or quasi-incompetent. This also extends to anyone who is guilty of gross misconduct, bankrupt or likely to endanger the child/children’s property. The courts may however in the case of bankruptcy only deprive the person only of the right to management of the property. Parental control in the above is covered by Section 1499/1 of the Thai Civil and Commercial Code.
In the matter of a divorce in Thailand based on mutual control, the parties will decide on the child custody themselves in terms of Section 1520. Should they not be able to agree then an application to court would have to be made for the courts to decide on parental control of the child or individual children. If however the person with parental control (a guardian) behaves improperly application to court in terms of Section 1521 would be instituted. The courts would then decide on a new guardian to exercise parental control.
Even in an unopposed or uncontested divorce in Thailand the need to ensure that none of your rights are infringed on is important. Always obtain the services of a divorce attorney in Thailand to at the very least draft your divorce agreement for you. Parental control is an important issue especially where one spouse might have had children not of the other. Child custody is also very important when one parent may decide to move back home, be it in Thailand or back home to his/her native country. Always ensure your rights of parental control during a divorce in Thailand. Consult a divorce attorney in Thailand today about parental control / child custody.
child custody Thailand.
Parental control is decided by the courts if the parties to the divorce in Thailand cannot agree. This is how it usually is done in Thailand during a divorce.
If the marriage is deemed to be void the parties may be able to agree about parental powers and monthly maintenance. This agreement would be made in writing. If no agreement can be reached, the courts will decide on parental control and maintenance. If however there is reason to deprive one of the spouses of parental control under Section 1582 the courts may appoint a guardian. Parental control may be deprived of someone who has been declared incompetent or quasi-incompetent. This also extends to anyone who is guilty of gross misconduct, bankrupt or likely to endanger the child/children’s property. The courts may however in the case of bankruptcy only deprive the person only of the right to management of the property. Parental control in the above is covered by Section 1499/1 of the Thai Civil and Commercial Code.
In the matter of a divorce in Thailand based on mutual control, the parties will decide on the child custody themselves in terms of Section 1520. Should they not be able to agree then an application to court would have to be made for the courts to decide on parental control of the child or individual children. If however the person with parental control (a guardian) behaves improperly application to court in terms of Section 1521 would be instituted. The courts would then decide on a new guardian to exercise parental control.
Even in an unopposed or uncontested divorce in Thailand the need to ensure that none of your rights are infringed on is important. Always obtain the services of a divorce attorney in Thailand to at the very least draft your divorce agreement for you. Parental control is an important issue especially where one spouse might have had children not of the other. Child custody is also very important when one parent may decide to move back home, be it in Thailand or back home to his/her native country. Always ensure your rights of parental control during a divorce in Thailand. Consult a divorce attorney in Thailand today about parental control / child custody.
Divorce in Thailand: Disputed. Divorce battle Thailand...
Divorce in Thailand: Disputed
divorce battle Thailand
A divorce in Thailand is fairly straightforward however in many divorce proceedings in Thailand there tends to be a dispute which the parties cannot settle amongst themselves. This would typically be a dispute as to property or disputes related to the child/children.
The following documents would be needed during divorce proceedings in Thailand:
The original Marriage Certificate;
The original Identification card and House Registration Book of the Thai spouse;
The original passport;
The original Divorce agreement if you have one;
The original Prenuptial Agreement if you have one.
Evidence base on Grounds for Divorce, Section 1516
The most common disputes which arise from a divorce in Thailand would be seen as:
Guardianship of the Child or children
Child custody or the custody of the children
Access granted to the children/child and their ability to travel overseas
Fixed Property ( especially joint property such as a house)
Fixed Property inherited during the course of the marriage
Maintenance of both the minors or the spouse
Varied complications with regard to property bought in the name of the spouse
Spouse’s support/ maintenance, financial
Any divorce in Thailand especially when you do not have the ability to speak/read the Thai language would be much easier if it is handled by a reputable attorney. Like any divorce, they tend to be long drawn out procedures and disputes. It is always best to retain the services of a legal counsel when starting divorce proceedings as Thai divorce law can be complex and time consuming. Always speak to an attorney before going into any proceedings.
divorce battle Thailand
A divorce in Thailand is fairly straightforward however in many divorce proceedings in Thailand there tends to be a dispute which the parties cannot settle amongst themselves. This would typically be a dispute as to property or disputes related to the child/children.
The following documents would be needed during divorce proceedings in Thailand:
The original Marriage Certificate;
The original Identification card and House Registration Book of the Thai spouse;
The original passport;
The original Divorce agreement if you have one;
The original Prenuptial Agreement if you have one.
Evidence base on Grounds for Divorce, Section 1516
The most common disputes which arise from a divorce in Thailand would be seen as:
Guardianship of the Child or children
Child custody or the custody of the children
Access granted to the children/child and their ability to travel overseas
Fixed Property ( especially joint property such as a house)
Fixed Property inherited during the course of the marriage
Maintenance of both the minors or the spouse
Varied complications with regard to property bought in the name of the spouse
Spouse’s support/ maintenance, financial
Any divorce in Thailand especially when you do not have the ability to speak/read the Thai language would be much easier if it is handled by a reputable attorney. Like any divorce, they tend to be long drawn out procedures and disputes. It is always best to retain the services of a legal counsel when starting divorce proceedings as Thai divorce law can be complex and time consuming. Always speak to an attorney before going into any proceedings.
Divorce in Thailand: Consent. unopposed divorce in Thailand...
Divorce in Thailand: Consent
unopposed divorce in Thailand
Applying for a divorce in Thailand can be done reasonably easily if both parties agree to the divorce. Mutual consent to the divorce is simply a matter of both parties going to the District Registration office or Amphur in Thailand. This is the easiest type of divorce in Thailand. They would need the following documents for the divorce:
The original Marriage Certificate;
The original Identification card of the Thai spouse;
The original passport;
The original Divorce agreement if you have one;
The original Prenuptial Agreement if you have one.
Before the divorce registration, in case that the parties do not have the divorce agreement with them, the registrar will ask the parties to fill in a blank form of the divorce agreement which have blanks with regards to the property, child custody, debts/liabilities and others, and when the parties can agree, both of them will have to sign the agreement.
The divorce agreement is only in Thai and it would cover the following:
Property
Child Custody / Guardianship
Debts/Liabilities
Others
Once the divorce agreement has been signed the registrar will draft the memorandum of the divorce registration and have both parties sign off on the documents. They would then be issued a divorce certificate. All the documents are in the Thai language and this is where most problems would set in.
Common problems occur with regards to the following:
Guardianship and/or Child custody.
Access to the children/child
Property ( especially joint property)
Property inherited during the court of the marriage
Maintenance of minors or the spouse
Complications with regards to fixed property bought in the name of the other
Spouse’s support/ maintenance/ financial
Even though the process of an unopposed divorce does appear simple it does become complicated when all the variables are added. Once the documents are signed, it would take a court order to change any of the conditions changed later. It is best even during the process of a seemingly straightforward divorce to retain the services of an attorney. Do not rest with the thought that the officials at the District Registration office (“Amphurs office”) level of English will be at a level you would understand. In most cases it tends to be the ex-wife who would attempt to explain the process to the husband. Could you really trust the person you are about to divorce in Thailand to explain what your rights are?
Any divorce in Thailand when you do not speak or read the Thai language would be much easier if it is handled by a reputable attorney who at the very least would draft the divorce agreement for you. Retain an attorney for your divorce in Thailand today.
unopposed divorce in Thailand
Applying for a divorce in Thailand can be done reasonably easily if both parties agree to the divorce. Mutual consent to the divorce is simply a matter of both parties going to the District Registration office or Amphur in Thailand. This is the easiest type of divorce in Thailand. They would need the following documents for the divorce:
The original Marriage Certificate;
The original Identification card of the Thai spouse;
The original passport;
The original Divorce agreement if you have one;
The original Prenuptial Agreement if you have one.
Before the divorce registration, in case that the parties do not have the divorce agreement with them, the registrar will ask the parties to fill in a blank form of the divorce agreement which have blanks with regards to the property, child custody, debts/liabilities and others, and when the parties can agree, both of them will have to sign the agreement.
The divorce agreement is only in Thai and it would cover the following:
Property
Child Custody / Guardianship
Debts/Liabilities
Others
Once the divorce agreement has been signed the registrar will draft the memorandum of the divorce registration and have both parties sign off on the documents. They would then be issued a divorce certificate. All the documents are in the Thai language and this is where most problems would set in.
Common problems occur with regards to the following:
Guardianship and/or Child custody.
Access to the children/child
Property ( especially joint property)
Property inherited during the court of the marriage
Maintenance of minors or the spouse
Complications with regards to fixed property bought in the name of the other
Spouse’s support/ maintenance/ financial
Even though the process of an unopposed divorce does appear simple it does become complicated when all the variables are added. Once the documents are signed, it would take a court order to change any of the conditions changed later. It is best even during the process of a seemingly straightforward divorce to retain the services of an attorney. Do not rest with the thought that the officials at the District Registration office (“Amphurs office”) level of English will be at a level you would understand. In most cases it tends to be the ex-wife who would attempt to explain the process to the husband. Could you really trust the person you are about to divorce in Thailand to explain what your rights are?
Any divorce in Thailand when you do not speak or read the Thai language would be much easier if it is handled by a reputable attorney who at the very least would draft the divorce agreement for you. Retain an attorney for your divorce in Thailand today.
During the year, and at December 2007
During the year, and at December 2007 an interesting article made the news headlines in Thailand pertaining to divorce in Thailand with regards to expats. The Khon Kaen civil court in the period of three months had 142 divorce cases filed. The oddity about the 142 divorces in Thailand was that they had all been from mixed couples. That is Thai women wanting to divorce their western husbands. The Chief Justice of the Family Court pointed out that the time line for the 142 divorce cases had been between the period of 1st July 2007 and the 30th September 2007. Apparently according to the judge, the woman had become disillusioned by their marriages. What those reasons are though is not know. There had been no further statistics provided as to age groupings, financial status or nationalities of those in the divorce proceedings.
Even though it might be a total fluke, it does raise the question of the rise in divorce rates in Thailand overall. Like everything else, people getting married fail to heed the advice from attorneys to not only do a full investigation of their proposed spouse but to also protect their assets with a prenuptial agreement.
Even though it might be a total fluke, it does raise the question of the rise in divorce rates in Thailand overall. Like everything else, people getting married fail to heed the advice from attorneys to not only do a full investigation of their proposed spouse but to also protect their assets with a prenuptial agreement.
Εγγραφή σε:
Αναρτήσεις (Atom)
.jpg)